1887
ASEG2003 - 16th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

A time-lapse crosshole resistivity tomography trial was conducted at the Bolivar Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) trial site, north of Adelaide between 1999 and 2001, to image aquifer properties and preferential flow paths. A bipole-bipole electrode configuration was used in order to reduce the effect of the top layers in the experiment. Five monitor wells were drilled on a circle of radius 75m for acquiring the crosshole resistivity data.

In total, seven time-lapse crosshole resistivity surveys were carried at different stages of fresh water injection. All survey data were processed, inverted and interpreted with the aid of numerical resistivity modelling and inversion code. It appears that the injected water flows in all directions, but mainly flows towards the south and the north; the injected water reached wells in the north and south but did not reach wells in the east and west by the end of the water injection. In general, the resistivity distribution in the region decreases with depth in the aquifer. A thin high resistivity layer at a depth of 130m was detected, which separates the T2 aquifer into two parts.

From this project, we learnt that resistivity inversion is a very necessary tool for crosshole resistivity data interpretation. There is no better way to analyse and interpret the data properly and accurately. However to obtain a good inversion result, adequate data and the right survey configuration are crucial.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab191
2003-08-01
2026-01-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Frangos, W., 1994, Electrical detection of leaks in lined waste ponds, 64th Ann. Internat. Mtg. Soc. of Expl. Geophys., 648-651.
  2. Greenhalgh, S., Zhe, J. and Zhou B. 2001. A trial of cross-hole electric imaging for monitoring aquifer artificial recharge. Proc IAH XXXI Congress, Munich, Sept 2001.
  3. Keller, G. V., and F. C. Frischknecht, 1966, Electrical Methods in Geophysical Prospecting: Pergamon Press, New York, 517 pp.
  4. Kunetz, G, 1966, Principles of direct current resistivity prospecting: Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin, 103 pp.
  5. Lesur, V., Cuer, M., and Straub, A., 1999, 2-D and 3-D interpretation of electrical tomography measurements, Parti: The forward problem, Geophysics, 64, 386-395.
  6. Lesur, V., Cuer, M., and Straub, A., 1999, 2-D and 3-D interpretation of electrical tomography measurements, Part2: The inverse problem, Geophysics, 64, 396-402.
  7. Pyne, R.D.G., 1995, Groundwater Recharge and Wells: A guide to aquifer storage recovery. Lewis Publisher, CRC Press, 376p.
  8. Zhou, B., and Greenhalgh, S.A., 1999, Explicit expressions and numerical calculations for the Frechet and second derivatives in 2.5-D Helmholtz equation inversion, Geophysical Prospecting, 47, 443-468.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab191
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ASR; Crosshole resistivity tomography; resistivity modelling and inversion
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error