1887
ASEG2004 - 17th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Deep magnetotelluric (MT) surveys provide information on thickness, electrical resistivity and tectonic history of Precambrian lithosphere that is relevant to diamond exploration. In regions where lithosphere is electrically resistive, its thickness can be inferred from the observed depth of a conductor at 100 km to 300 km taken as defining the top of the electrical asthenosphere. In some locations high conductivity is observed within the lithosphere and, at depths above the diamond stability field, may be attributed to the presence of graphite. The form of crustal and upper mantle conductors, interpreted with deep seismic information, provides information that can be used to constrain the tectonic history of a region, eg, defining the geometry of past subduction.

Surveys in the Slave craton in northern Canada have identified an MT phase anomaly that is coincident with both a diamond-bearing Eocene kimberlite field and an upper mantle geochemical anomaly. The phase anomaly is explained by a conductor, with its upper surface at 80 to 120 km depth and the enhanced conductivity is interpreted as being due to graphite or an interconnected carbon grain-boundary film. In the western Superior Province in central Canada, MT surveys have delineated a mantle conductor at a depth of 130 km. The MT responses define the geoelectric fabric of both the crust and subcrustal lithosphere and indicate that the subcrustal lithosphere is of Archaean age.

© ASEG 2004
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2004ab044
2004-12-01
2026-01-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2004ab044
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Davis, W.J., and Bleeker, W., 1999, Timing of plutonism, deformation, and metamorphism in the Yellowknife Domain, Slave Province, Canada: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 36, 1169-1187.
  2. Davis, W.J., Jones, A.G., Bleeker W., and Griitter, H., 2002, Lithospheric development in the Slave Craton: a linked crustal and mantle perspective: Lithos 71, 575-589.
  3. Ferguson, I.J., Craven, J.A, Kurtz, R.D., Boerner, D.E. Bailey, R.C, Wu, X., Orellana, M.R., Spratt, J., Wennberg, G., and Norton, M, (submitted), Geoelectric responses of Archean lithosphere in the western Superior Province, central Canada: Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors.
  4. Fipke, C.E., Dummett, H.T., Moore, R.O., Carlson, J.A, Ashley, R.M, Gurney, J.J, and Kirkley, M.B, 1995, History of the discovery of diamondiferous kimberlites in the Northwest Territories, Canada: Proceedings of the 6 International Kimberlite Conference, 158-160.
  5. Griffin, W.L, Doyle, B.J, Ryan, C.G, Pearson, N.J, O'Reilly, S.Y, Davies, R, Kivi, K, van Achterbergh, E, and Natapov, L.M, 1999, Layered mantle lithosphere in the Lac de Gras area, Slave craton: composition, structure and origin: Journal of Petrology 40, 705-727.
  6. Griitter, H.S, Apter, D.B, and Kong, J, 1999, Crust-mantle coupling; evidence from mantle-derived xenocrystic garnets. Proceedings of the 7th International Kimberlite Conference, vol. 1, 307-313.
  7. Hoffman, P.F, 1989, Precambrian geology and tectonic history of North America, p 447-512: In, The geology of North America; an overview, Bally, A.W. (ed.), Geological Society of America, Boulder, U.S.A.
  8. Jones, A.G, 1999, Imaging the continental upper mantle using electromagnetic methods: Lithos 48, 57-80.
  9. Jones, A.G, and Craven J.A, 2004, Area selection for diamond exploration using deep-probing electromagnetic surveying: Lithos, in press.
  10. Jones, A.G, Eaton, D.W, White, D, Bostick, M, Mareschal, M, and Cassidy, J. 1996, Geophysical measurements for lithospheric parameters, p 243-250: In, Searching for Diamonds in Canada, LeCheminant, AN, DiLabio, R.N.W., and Richardson, K.A. (ed.), Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 3228.
  11. Jones, A.G, Ferguson, I.J, Chave, A.D, Evans, R.L, and McNeice, G.W., 2001, The electric lithosphere of the Slave craton: Geology 29, 423-426.
  12. Jones, A.G, Lezaeta, P, Ferguson, I.J, Chave, A.D, Evans, R.L, Garcia, X, and Spratt, J, 2003, The electrical structure of the Slave craton: Lithos 71, 505-527.
  13. Kirkley, M.B, Gurney, J.J, and Levinson, A.A, 1991, Age, origin, and emplacement of diamonds: a review of scientific advances in the last decade: Gems and Gemology 27, 2-25.
  14. Kong, J.M, Boucher, D.R, and Scott Smith, B.H, 1999, Exploration and geology of the Attawapiskat Kimberlites, James Bay Lowland, Northern Ontario, Canada: Proceedings of 7th International Kimberlite Conference, vol. 1, 452-467.
  15. Rodi, W, and Mackie, R.L. 2001, Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2-D magnetotelluric inversion: Geophysics 66, 174-187.
  16. Sol, S, Thomson, C.J, Kendall, J.-M, White, D, VanDecar, J.C, and Asudeh, I, 2002, Seismic tomographic images of the cratonic upper mantle beneath the Western Superior Province of the Canadian Shield: Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 134, 53-69.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2004ab044
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Canada; diamonds; lithosphere; Magnetotellurics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error