1887
ASEG2004 - 17th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

The presence of fractures in a reservoir is a main cause of azimuthal anisotropy of its elastic properties. A shear wave propagating in an azimuthally anisotropic medium splits into two components with different polarizations if the source polarization is not aligned with the principal symmetry axis. If the direction of shear wave propagation is not parallel to the plane of fracturing, shear-wave splitting will depend upon the normal fracture compliance, which in turn depends upon the properties of the filling fluid. If the system of pores and fractures in a fluid-saturated rock is interconnected, then fluid flow between pores and fractures must be taken into account. How shear-wave splitting varies with fluid properties depends upon the assumptions that are made regarding the pressure relationship existing between pores and fractures. In this paper we use the anisotropic Gassmann equations, and existing formulations for the excess compliance experienced due to fracturing, to estimate the splitting of vertically propagating shear waves as a function of the fluid modulus. This is done for a porous medium with a single set of dipping fractures and with two conjugate fracture sets dipping with opposite dips to the vertical. The estimation is achieved using two alternative approaches. The first approach assumes that the fractures and pore space are in full pressure equilibrium with respect to fluid flow. That is, the frequency of the elastic disturbance is low enough to allow enough time for fluid flow between the fractures and the pore space. In the second approach each of the fracture sets are in full pressure equilibrium with the surrounding pore space, but not with the other fracture set. That is, the frequency is low enough to allow fluid flow between a fracture set and the surrounding pore space, but high enough so that there is not enough time during the period of the elastic disturbance for fluid flow between fracture sets to occur. It is found that the second approach yields a much stronger dependency of shear-wave splitting on the fluid modulus than the first one.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2004ab046
2004-12-01
2026-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brown, R. J. S., and Korringa, J., 1975, On the dependence of the elastic properties of a porous rock on the compressibility of the pore fluid: Geophysics, 40, 608-616.
  2. Crampin, S., 1985, Evaluation of anisotropy by shear-wave splitting: Geophysics, 50, 142-152.
  3. Gassmann, F., 1951, Uber die elastizit–t poroser medien: Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Zurich, 96, 1-23.
  4. Hudson, J. A., 1980, Overall properties of a cracked solid: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 88, 371-384.
  5. van der Kolk, C, Guest, W, S., and Potters, J.H.H.M., 2001, The 3D shear experiment over the Natih field in Oman: the effect of fracture-filling fluids on shear propagation: Geophysical Prospecting, 49, 179-197.
  6. Musgrave, M.J.P, 1970, Crystal Acoustics: Holden-Day Inc., Oakland CA.
  7. Reiss, L., H., 1980, The Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Fractured Formations: Editions Technip.
  8. Sayers, C, M., and Kachanov, M., 1995, Microcrack-induced elastic wave anisotropy of brittle rocks: Journal of Geophysical Research, 100, 4149-4156.
  9. Sayers, CM., 2002, Fluid-dependent shear-wave splitting in fractured media: Geophysical Prospecting, 50, 393-401.
  10. Schoenberg, M., 1980, Elastic wave behavior across linear slip interfaces: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, 1516-1521.
  11. Schoenberg, M., and Douma, J., 1988, Elastic wave propagation in media with parallel fractures and aligned cracks: Geophysical Prospecting, 36, 571-590.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2004ab046
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): anisotropy; fractures; poroelasticity; shear-wave splitting
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error