1887
ASEG2004 - 17th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Seismic datasets are often spatially undersampled in 3D exploration. Trace interpolation, a well-known solution to this sampling deficiency, is often used to generate unrecorded traces from a spatially undersampled dataset. One interpolation method used routinely for this task is the so-called - domain prediction filter interpolation method. This method operates on 2D seismic data to interpolate spatially aliased events. For 3D data, it is possible to extend the method to the -- domain.

-- prediction filters operate in the frequency space domain where for each frequency plane a two-dimensional prediction filter is computed. The 2-D filter can be computed by either 1) solving for a quadrant filter and then placing its conjugate flipped version opposite itself, this is called a pseudo-noncausal filter; or 2) solving for all the prediction coefficients in a single operation, this is called a non-causal filter.

While pseudo-noncausal filters are commonly used in trace interpolation methods, their non-causal counterparts can offer some significant advantages, namely, they are more centre-loaded, less sensitive to the size of window used in their derivation and better in handling amplitude variation.

In this paper we show how the technique of 2-D trace interpolation can be extended to 3-D trace interpolation. In addition, we demonstrate the benefits of using noncausal prediction filters over their pseudo non-causal counterparts through their applications on synthetic and field data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2004ab073
2004-12-01
2026-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abma, R., and Kabir, N., 2003, Comparisons of interpolation methods in the presence of aliased events: 73r Meeting, SEG, Dallas, Expanded Abstracts, 1909-1912.
  2. Canales, L. L., 1984, Random noise reduction: 54th Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 525-527.
  3. Chase, M. K., 1992, Random noise reduction by FXY prediction filtering: Expl. Geophys., 23, 51-56.
  4. Gülünay, N., 2000, Noncausal spatial prediction filtering for random noise reduction on 3-D poststack data: Geophysics 65, 1641-1653.
  5. Hung, B., and Notfors, C, 2003, Seismic trace interpolation using noncausal spatial filters in the f-x-y domain: 65 Mtg.: Eur. Assn. Geosci. Eng., D21.
  6. Jain, A. K., 1981, Advances in mathematical models for image processing: Proc. IEEE, 69, 502-528.
  7. Porsani, M. J., 1999, Seismic trace interpolation using half-step prediction filters: Geophysics 64, 1461-1467.
  8. Spitz, S., 1991, Seismic trace interpolation in the F-X domain: Geophysics, 56, 785-794.
  9. Wang, Y., 2002, Seismic trace interpolation in the f-x-y domain: Geophysics 67, 1232-1239.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2004ab073
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): interpolation; noncausal; prediction filtering
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error