1887
ASEG2004 - 17th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Electrical imaging surveys that are now widely used in many environmental and engineering studies have also been carried out in water-covered areas. These surveys include conventional surveys with multi-electrode resistivity meter systems where part of the survey line crosses a river. In some surveys that are located entirely within a water-covered environment, the electrodes are mounted on a streamer that is towed behind a boat. The streamer is dragged along the river/sea bottom, or floats on the water surface. The smoothness-constrained least-squares inversion method that is used to interpret the data from land surveys is adapted for underwater surveys. To accommodate the underwater topography, a distorted finite-element grid is used to calculate the apparent resistivity values for the inversion model. The first few rows of elements are used to model the water layer, while the lower part of the grid is used for the sub-bottom resistivity distribution. For an accurate inversion, the water resistivity as well as the depth to the bottom surface must be accurately known since a large proportion of the current flows through the water layer. The section of the Earth below the bottom surface is subdivided into a large number of rectangular cells. The water resistivity in the model is fixed, and the inversion program attempts to determine the resistivity of the cells that would most accurately reproduced the observed measurements. Examples from surveys in rivers, marine environments and across rivers are shown.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2004ab091
2004-12-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acworth, R.I., and Dasey, G.R., 2003, Mapping of the hyporheic zone around a tidal creek using a combination of borehole logging, borehole electrical tomography and cross-creek electrical imaging: Hydrogeology Journal 11, 3, 368-377.
  2. Bernstone, C, and Dahlin, T., 1999, Assessment of two automated electrical resistivity data acquisition systems for landfill location surveys: two case histories: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 4, 2, 113-122.
  3. Dahlin, T., 1996, 2D resistivity surveying for environmental and engineering applications: First Break 14, 275-284.
  4. deGroot-Hedlin, C, and Constable, S., 1990, Occam’s inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models form magnetotelluric data: Geophysics 55, 1613-1624.
  5. Denne, R., Collin, S., Brown, P., Hee, R., and White, R.M.S., 2001, A new survey design for 3D IP inversion modelling at Copper Hill: ASEG 15th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition.
  6. Ellis, R.G., and Oldenburg, D.W., 1994, Applied geophysical inversion: Geophysical Journal International 116, 5-11.
  7. Griffiths, D.H., and Barker, R.D., 1993, Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modelling in areas of complex geology: Journal of Applied Geophysics 29, 211-226.
  8. Loke, M.H., 2000, Topographic modelling in resistivity imaging inversion: 62nd EAGE Conference & Technical Exhibition Extended Abstracts, D-2.
  9. Loke, M.H., and Barker, R.D., 1996a, Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections using a quasi-Newton method: Geophysical Prospecting 44, 131-152.
  10. Loke, M.H., and Barker, R.D, 1996b, Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion: Geophysical Prospecting 44, 499-523.
  11. Loke, M.H., Acworth, I., and Dahlin, T., 2003, A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys: Exploration Geophysics 34, 182-187.
  12. Panissod, C, Dabas, M., Hesse, A., Jolivet, A., Tabbagh, J., and Tabbagh, A., 1998, Recent developments in shallow depth electrical and electrostatic prospecting using mobile arrays: Geophysics 65, 1542-1550.
  13. Ritz, M., Parisot, J.-C, Diouf S., Beauvais, A., and Dione, F., 1999, Electrical imaging of lateritic weathering mantles over granitic and metamorphic basement of eastern Senegal, West Africa: Journal of Applied Geophysics 41, 335-344.
  14. Seaton, W.J., and Burbey, T.J., 2000, Aquifer characterization in the Blue Ridge Physiographic Province using resistivity profiling and borehole geophysics: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 5, 3, 45-58.
  15. Silvester P.P., and Ferrari, R.L., 1990, Finite elements for electrical engineers: 2nd. ed., Cambridge University Press.
  16. Sorenson, K., 1996. Pulled Array Continuous Profiling: First Break 14, 85-90.
  17. Wynn, J.C., and Grosz, A.E., 2000, Induced-polarization – a tool for mapping titanium-bearing placers, hidden metallic objects, urban waste on and beneath the seafloor: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 5, 3, 27-35.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2004ab091
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): imaging; inversion; Resistivity; water-covered
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error