1887
ASEG2004 - 17th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Many AEM inversion techniques have been applied successfully to locating isolated, highly conducting targets in uniform hosts. What happens when these targets occur in complex hosts overlain by non-uniform regolith with topographic features? In principle, a full 3D inversion is possible due to the availability of forward modelling programs capable of accounting for the full geoelectric complexity of any terrane. In practice, the inherent non-uniqueness coupled with modelling and data errors plus the requirement of substantial computation times render this approach unappealing for all but the most academic of inverters. On the other end of the complexity scale, simple imaging methods such as CDIs can fail badly for dipping targets and Born style approximations produce wrong models for moderate to high conductivity contrasts. This can be demonstrated by using accurate forward modelling algorithms to compute the EM responses of models produced by these methods.

Practical AEM data interpretation requires a technique that is capable of recognising drill targets in a variety of terranes but one that doesn’t require excess complexity or massive computing times. One such method, LeroiAir, is based on 3D thin sheet models in a layered, conducting host. The implicit forward model is fast, easy to set up and takes account of vortex and current gathering for any conductivity contrast. It is also capable of modelling the effects of other conductors such as faults and palaochannels. As expected, the thin-sheet inversion works well for simple isolated targets. As complexity increases, the inversion quality degrades but still yields useful drill target information in many cases.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2004ab118
2004-12-01
2026-01-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Annetts, D., Sugeng, F. and Raiche, A, 2003, Modelling and matching the airborne EM response of Harmony and Maggie
  2. Hays, Extended Abstracts for ASEG 16th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Adelaide
  3. Chen, Jiuping and Raiche, Art, 1998, Inverting AEM data using a damped eigenparameter approach, Exploration Geophysics, 29, 128-132.
  4. Raiche, Art, Annetts, David, and Sugeng, Fred, 2003, Finding targets in complex hosts using airborne EM, Extended Abstracts for ASEG 16th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Adelaide.
  5. Raiche, A., Sugeng, F. and Soininen, H., 2003, Using the Loki 3D edge-finite-element program to model EM dipole-dipole drill-hole data, Extended Abstracts for ASEG 16th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Adelaide
  6. Raiche, A., Sugeng, F. and Xiong, Z., 1996, Modelling complex structures using the thin sheet approximation, Conference Volume for the 13th Workshop on Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth, Onuma, Japan, p. 107-108.
  7. Wolfgram, P., and Golden, H., 2001, Airborne EM applied to sulphide nickel – examples and analysis, Extended Abstracts for ASEG 15th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Brisbane.
  8. Xiong, Z. and Tripp, A. C, 1995, A block iterative algorithm for 3D electromagnetic modeling using integral equations with symmetrized substructures, Geophysics, 60, 291-295
  9. Zhdanov, M. S., and Tartaras, E., 2002, Three-dimensional inversion of multitransmitter electromagnetic data based on the localized quasi-linear approximation: Geophysical Journal International 148, 506-519
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2004ab118
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): airborne EM; EM modelling; Inversion
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error