1887
ASEG2004 - 17th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Seismoelectric methods are based upon physical properties of the earth that produce electrical signals from seismic waves. The electrokinetic sounding (EKS) is one such method that has great potential for hydrogeological studies as it arises from the movement of pore fluids under seismic excitation. In theory, the method should be able to directly map changes in hydraulic permeability, rock porosity, or fluid-chemistry. A number of researchers have recently tried to exploit the phenomenon in groundwater problems where the conventional methods worked poorly. However, publications of successful case histories to support the theory are rare. This may be blamed upon the very weak amplitudes of the electrical signals generated from the seismic wave which are milivolts to nanovolts in magnitude, and the presence of cultural noise which is usually much greater in magnitude.

We demonstrate electrokinetic responses from formations more than 50 metres deep in two test areas in Western Australia. One is over a saline paleochannel and the other over a freshwater aquifer. The data was generated from a sledgehammer source and recorded by a seismic acquisition system. Seismic refraction and reflection data provide seismic velocity information for depth conversion and support the seismoelectric data. The signals were then compared to borehole logs to find what physical contrasts were detected. Significant hydrogeological boundaries were detected up to 50 m deep in saline groundwater conditions, and at least 80 m deep in freshwater aquifers. In addition, we examine some pitfalls in the method and our approach to overcoming these problems.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2004ab124
2004-12-01
2026-01-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boulytchov, A., 2002, Seismic-electric benchmarking of caves and underground water horizons: 72nd Meeting., SEG, Utah, Expanded Abstracts, 1594 - 1597.
  2. Butler, K.E., Kepic, A.W., and Rosid, M.S., 2002, An experimental seismoelectric survey for groundwater exploration in the Australian Outback: 72nd Meeting., SEG, Utah, Expanded Abstracts,1484 - 1487.
  3. Butler, K.E., Russell, R.D., Kepic, A.W., and Maxwell, M., 1996, Measurement of the seismoelectric response from a shallow boundary: Geophysics, 61, 1769 - 1778.
  4. Garambois, S., and Dietrich, M., 2001, Seismoelectric wave conversions in porous media: Field measurements and transfer function analysis: Geophysics, 66,1417 - 1430.
  5. Haartsen, M.W., and Pride, S.R., 1997, Electroseismic waves from point sources in layered media: Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, 24745-24769.
  6. Jouniaux, J., and Pozzi, J., 1995, Streaming potential and permeability of saturated sandstones under triaxial stress: Consequences for electrotelluric anomalies prior to earthquakes: Journal of Geophysical Research, 100, 10197 -10209.
  7. Revil, A., Darot, M., and Pezard, PA., 1996, From surface electrical properties to spontaneous potentials in porous media: Survey Geophysics, 17, 331 - 346.
  8. Rosid, Mohammad S., and Kepic, Anton W., 2003, Electrokinetic sounding method to map hydrogeological boundaries: Regional Regolith Symposia, CRC LEME, Perth, 27 - 28 November, Expanded Abstract, p. 364 - 368.
  9. Strachan, E., and Wolfe, P.J., 2001, Seismoelectric investigation at clean and contaminated sites: 14th Ann. Symposium, EEGS, Expanded Abstracts.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2004ab124
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): electrokinetic; groundwater; hydrogeological; seismoelectric; Western Australia
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error