1887
ASEG2006 - 18th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Traditionally, geoscientific data collected by GeoScience Victoria (GSV) were held in databases focussed on providing the content for maps and their accompanying legends. A wealth of information would be stored in free-text legend fields or geological reports. Analysis of these data using other software is difficult and this approach can lead to inconsistent or contradictory systems.

GSV has redesigned its geological information systems, based on a data model that describes true geological entities and concepts. Consequently, information stored by GSV can be more readily used for a variety of purposes and by a variety of users, and the information model is not constrained by the implementation requirements of a particular vendor.

Research was conducted to identify models generated by other groups or agencies before adopting the North American Geologic Map Data Model - Conceptual Model 1.0. This model provided the foundation for a logical model explicitly defining the geoscientific concepts with respect to GSV’s business requirements. The geoscientific application of the Geography Mark-up Language .GeoSciML, was used as a reference during the logical modelling.

An extensible pair of aspatial and spatial databases was constructed. Web-services, including Open GIS Consortium (OGC) compliant web map services and web feature services, will be used to deliver data to client applications. These databases will enable GSV to conduct it’s own work and deliver its data to external parties using international standard exchange languages such as GeoSciML.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2006ab151
2006-12-01
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cox, S.J.D., 2004, XMML – a standards conformant XML language for transfer of exploration data: Proceedings, ASEG/PESA Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Sydney 2004
  2. Government Geologists Information Policy Advisory Committee, 2004, National Geological Model Version 1.0 Explanatory Notes: http://www.geoscience.gov.au/geoportal/standards.html
  3. McFadden, F.R., Hoffer, J.A. and Prescott, M.B., 1999, Modern database management: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers
  4. North American Geologic Map Data Model Steering Committee, 2004, NADM Conceptual Model 1.0–A conceptual model for geologic map information: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2004–1334, 58 p., accessed online at URL http://pubs.usgs.gov/oi/2004/1334. Also published as Geological Survey of Canada Open File 4737, 1 CD-ROM.
  5. Simons, B., Ritchie, A, Bibby, L., Callaway, G., Welch’S., and Miller, B., 2005, Designing and building an object-relational geoscientific database using the North American Conceptual Geology Map Data Model (NADM-C1) from an Australian perspective: Proceedings of IAMG’05: GIS and Spatial Analysis, Vol.2, 929-934.
  6. Simons, B., Boisvert, E., Brodaric, B., Cox, S., Duffy, T., Johnson, B.R., Laxton, J.L. and Richard, S., 2006, GeoSciML: enabling the exchange of geological map data: Proceedings of the Australian Earth Sciences Convention 2006, Melbourne, Australia.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2006ab151
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): data model; database; geographic information system; geology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error