1887
ASEG2006 - 18th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Since the advent of plate tectonics different reference frames have been proposed to describe the “absolute” motion of plates. The most prominent ones include the hot spot reference frame and the no-net-rotation reference frame. The difference in absolute plate motion between different reference frames can be substantial (up to 4 cm/yr). These differences are truly significant, considering that the velocity of the fast plates is only 6-12 cm/yr in such reference frames. It is thus of primary importance to extract which of these reference frames is most likely to describe the absolute motion of plates. Here we propose that the best candidate representing an absolute reference frame is the one, which minimizes the cumulative amount of trench migration for all subduction zones. From the absolute reference frames proposed thus far, it is found that the cumulative amount of trench migration is lowest in the Indo-Atlantic hot spot reference frame. This implies that the Indo-Atlantic hot spot reference frame is currently the best approximation of an absolute reference frame on Earth.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2006ab158
2006-12-01
2026-01-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Argus, D. F., and Gordon, R. G., 1991, No-net-rotation model of current plate velocities incorporating plate motion model Nuvel-1:Geophysical Research Letters, v. 18, p. 2039-2042.
  2. Bird, P., 2003, An updated digital model of plate boundaries: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, v. 4, p. 1027, doi: 10.1029/2001GC000252.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000252
  3. DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G., Argus, D. F., and Stein, S., 1994, Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 21, p. 2191-2194.
  4. DiVenere, V., and Kent, D. V., 1999, Are the Pacific and Indo-Atlantic hotspots fixed? Testing the plate circuit through Antarctica: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 170, p. 105-117.
  5. Gordon, R. G., and Jurdy, D. M., 1986, Cenozoic global plate motions: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 91, p. 12389-12406.
  6. Gripp, A. E., and Gordon, R. G., 1990, Current plate velocities relative to the hotspots incorporating the Nuvel-1 global plate motion model: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 17, p. 1109-1112.
  7. Gripp, A. E., and Gordon, R. G., 2002, Young tracks of hotspots and current plate velocities: Geophysical Journal International, v. 150, p.321-361.
  8. Gurnis, M., Hall, C., and Lavier, L., 2004, Evolving force balance during incipient subduction: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, v.5, p. Q07001, doi: 10.1029/2003GC000681.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GC000681
  9. Hamilton, W. B., 2003, An alternative Earth: GSA Today, v. 13, p. 4-12.
  10. Kaula, W. M., 1975, Absolute plate motions by boundary velocity minimizations: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 80, p. 244-248.
  11. Kincaid, C., and Olson, P., 1987, An experimental study of subduction and slab migration: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 92, p.13, 832-13,840.
  12. Kreemer, C., Holt, W. E., and Haines, A. J., 2003, An integrated global model of present-day plate motions and plate boundary deformation: Geophysical Journal International, v. 154, p. 8-34.
  13. Molnar, P., and Stock, J., 1987, Relative motions of hotspots in the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian oceans since Late Cretaceous time: Nature, v. 327, p. 587-591.
  14. Morgan, W. J., 1971, Convection plumes in the lower mantle: Nature, v.230, p. 42–3. Mtiller, R. D., Royer, J.-Y., and Lawver, L. A., 1993, Revised plate motions relative to hotspots from combined Atlantic and Indian Ocean hotspot tracks: Geology, v. 21, p. 275-278.
  15. O’Neill, C., Mttller, D., and Steinberger, B., 2005, On the uncertainties in hot spot reconstructions and the significance of moving hot spot reference frames: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, v. 6, p.Q04003, doi:10.1029/2004GC000784.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GC000784
  16. Pares, J. M., and Moore, T. C., 2005, New evidence for the Hawaiian hotspot plume motion since the Eocene: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 237, p. 951-959.
  17. Raymond, C. A., Stock, J. M., and Cande, S. C., 2000, Fast Paleogene motion of the Pacific hotspots from revised global plate circuit constraints, in Richards, M. A., Gordon, R. G., and van der Hilst, R.D., eds., The history and dynamics of global plate motions, 121.
  18. Geophysical Monograph, American Geophysical Union, p. 359-375. Schellart, W. P., 2004, Kinematics of subduction and subduction-induced flow in the upper mantle: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 109, p. B07401, doi:10.1029/2004JB002970.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB002970
  19. Schellart, W. P., 2005, Influence of the subducting plate velocity on the geometry of the slab and migration of the subduction hinge: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 231, p. 197-219.
  20. Stegman, D. R., Freeman, J., Schellart, W. P., Moresi, L., and May, D.A., (in press), Influence of trench width on subduction hinge retreat rates in 3-D models of slab rollback: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems. Steinberger, B., and O’Connell, R. J., 1998, Advection of plumes in mantle flow; implications for hot spot motion, mantle viscosity and plume distribution: Geophysical Journal International, v. 132, p. 412-434.
  21. Tarduno, J. A., Duncan, R. A., Scholl, D. W., Cottrell, R. D., Steinberger, B., Thordarson, T., Kerr, B. C, Neal, C. R., Frey, F. A., Torii, M., and Carvallo, C., 2003, The Emperor Scarriolante:Southward motion of the Hawaiian hotspot plume in Earth’s mantle: Science, v. 301, p. 1064-1069.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2006ab158
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error