1887
ASEG2007 - 19th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

The Mt Bulga ore body, which is located near Orange in south-eastern Australia, consists of a narrow (5 – 10 m) syngenetic fine grained banded massive pyrite-galenasphalerite- chalcopyrite in steeply dipping unfolded Silurian altered metasediments. Several major shear zones are associated with the ore body.

A 2D seismic refraction profile was recorded with a station separation of 2.5 m, across a small ridge, which also marks the approximate location of the massive sulphide ore body. The data were processed with wave eikonal traveltime (WET) tomography using a starting model generated with the 1D tau-p inversion algorithm and with the GRM SSM. The 1D tau-p refraction tomogram showed that the ore body has a higher seismic velocity than the adjacent regions, whereas the GRM SSM showed a low seismic velocity in the ore body. A density model, which was generated with the head wave amplitudes and the refractor velocities, showed a marked increase over the ore body, suggesting that the lower seismic velocity in the ore body is more likely. These results demonstrate that seismic refraction profiles can provide useful information on depths of weathering and density contrasts for joint inversion with either airborne or ground gravity data.

These results also demonstrate that the application of seismic reflection methods to the imagining of sulphide ore bodies will require detailed mapping of the nearsurface layers, in order compute useful statics corrections. The rapid changes in depths, as well as the large lateral variations in the seismic velocities in the unweathered material suggest that wave equation redatuming, rather than simple time shifts would be required.

© 2007 ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2007ab107
2007-12-01
2026-01-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2007ab107
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barthelmes, A. J., 1946, Application of continuous profiling to refraction shooting: Geophysics11, 24-42.
  2. Barry, K. M., 1967, Delay time and its application to refraction profile interpretation: in Seismic refraction prospecting, A. W. Musgrave, ed., Society of Exploration Geophysicists, p. 348-361.
  3. Barton, R., and Barker, N., 2003, Velocity imaging by tau-p transformation of refracted traveltimes: Geophysical Prospecting51, 195-203.
  4. Diebold, J. B., and Stoffa, P. l., 1981, The traveltime equation, tau-p mapping, and inversion of common midpoint data: Geophysics46, 238-254.
  5. Gardner, L. W., 1939, An areal plan for mapping subsurface structure by refraction shooting: Geophysics4, 247-259.
  6. Gibson, B. S., Odegard, M. E., and Sutton, G. H., 1979, Nonlinear least-squares inversion of traveltime data for a linear velocity-depth relationship: Geophysics44, 185-194.
  7. Hagedoorn, J.G., 1959, The plus-minus method of interpreting seismic refraction sections: Geophysical Prospecting7, 158– 182.
  8. Hagiwara, T., and Omote, S., 1939, Land creep at Mt Tyausu- Yama (Determination of slip plane by seismic prospecting): Tokyo University Earthquake Research Institute Bulletin17, 118–137.
  9. Hales, F. W., 1958, An accurate graphical method for interpreting seismic refraction lines: Geophysical Prospecting6, 285-294.
  10. Hawkins, L.V., 1961, The reciprocal method of routine shallow seismic refraction investigations: Geophysics26, 806–819.
  11. Lanz, E., Maurer H., and Green, A. G., 1998, Refraction tomography over a buried waste disposal site: Geophysics63, 1414-1433.
  12. Menke, W., 1989, Geophysical data analysis: discrete inverse theory, Academic Press.
  13. Palmer, D., 1980, The generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 104p.
  14. Palmer, D., 1981, An introduction to the generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation. Geophysics46, 1508-1518.
  15. Palmer, D., 1986, Refraction seismics: the lateral resolution of structure and seismic velocity. Geophysical Press.
  16. Palmer, D., 1991, The resolution of narrow low-velocity zones with the generalized reciprocal method. Geophysical Prospecting39, 1031-1060.
  17. Palmer, D, 2001b, Imaging refractors with the convolution section: Geophysics66, 1582-1589.
  18. Palmer, D, 2001c, Resolving refractor ambiguities with amplitudes: Geophysics66, 1590-1593.
  19. Palmer, D, 2001a, Digital processing of shallow seismic refraction data with the refraction convolution section. Ph D thesis, University of New South Wales, 256p.
  20. Palmer, D., 2006, Refraction traveltime and amplitude corrections for very near-surface inhomogeneities. Geophysical Prospecting54, 589-604.
  21. Palmer, D., Nikrouz, R., and Spyrou, A., 2005, Statics corrections for shallow seismic refraction data. Exploration Geophysics36, 7-17.
  22. Palmer, D., and Jones, L., 2005, A simple approach to refraction statics with the generalized reciprocal method and the refraction convolution section. Exploration Geophysics36, 18-25.
  23. Schuster, G. T., and Quintus-Bosz, A., 1993, Wavepath eikonal traveltime inversion: theory: Geophysics58, 1314- 1323.
  24. Sjogren, B., 1979, Refractor velocity determination - cause and nature of some errors: Geophysical Prospecting27, 507- 538.
  25. Sjogren, B., 1984, Shallow refraction seismics: Chapman and Hall.
  26. Sjogren, B., 2000, A brief study of the generalized reciprocal method and some limitations of the method. Geophysical Prospecting487, 815-834.
  27. Stefani, J. P., 1995, Turning-ray tomography: Geophysics60, 1917-1929.
  28. Taner, M. T., Wagner, D. E., Baysal, E., and Lee, L., 1998, A unified method for 2-D and 3-D refraction statics. Geophysics63 260-274.
  29. Whiteley, R. J., and Eccleston, P. J., 2006, Comparison of shallow seismic refraction interpretation methods for regolith mapping. Exploration Geophysics37, 340-347.
  30. Zhang, J., and Toksöz, M. N., 1998, Nonlinear refraction traveltime tomography: Geophysics63, 1726-1737.
  31. Zhu, X., Sixta, D. P., and Andstman, B. G., 1992, Tomostatics: turning-ray tomography + static corrections. The Leading Edge11, 15-23.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2007ab107
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): GRM; mining; refraction; statics; tomography

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error