1887
ASEG2007 - 19th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

Statics are the corrections to seismic reflection data for the weathered layer and variable topography. Traditional statics routines estimate an initial model of the weathering and then iteratively refine it with NMO velocity analyses and residual statics routines. However, this approach can often be inefficient, especially with the very large volumes of data characteristic of single sensor data, and it has not proven to be especially efficacious with shear wave statics where the low seismic velocities result in quite large traveltimes.

By contrast, a new GRM-RCS approach obtains an accurate time model of the weathering which does not require substantial improvement with residual statics. Accuracies of ±1 millisecond can be routinely achieved with good quality data. As a result, the new GRM-RCS approach can improve the efficiency of normal data processing through eliminating at least one iteration of velocity analyses and residual statics. Furthermore, the improved accuracy is necessary where higher frequencies are recorded with single sensor data, if the field statics are to be within half a cycle of the higher dominant frequencies for residual statics routines to be most effective.

There can be up to five stages with the GRM-RCS approach. Starting with a new 1D QC algorithm, each stage provides greater resolution of the time model than that obtained in the previous stage. In the final stage, the surface consistent time delays in the surface soil layers are separated from the non-surface consistent time delays originating at the base of the weathering.

Because the GRM algorithms are exact and do not require optimization or tomography for accuracy, they can be readily modified to accommodate field data of varying quality, such as with data in which cycle skipping occurs. Furthermore, they can be readily extended to full trace processing with the RCS.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2007ab108
2007-12-01
2026-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cox, M., 1999, Statics corrections for seismic reflection surveys: Society of Exploration Geophysicists. 531p.
  2. Palmer, D., 1980, The generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 104p.
  3. Palmer, D., 1981, An introduction to the generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation. Geophysics46, 1508-1518.
  4. Palmer, D., 1986, Refraction seismics: the lateral resolution of structure and seismic velocity. Geophysical Press.
  5. Palmer, D, 2001a, Imaging refractors with the convolution section: Geophysics66, 1582-1589.
  6. Palmer, D, 2001b, Resolving refractor ambiguities with amplitudes: Geophysics66, 1590-1593.
  7. Palmer, D., and Jones, L., 2005, A simple approach to refraction statics with the generalized reciprocal method and the refraction convolution section. Exploration Geophysics36, 18-25 .
  8. Palmer, D., 2006, Refraction traveltime and amplitude corrections for very near-surface inhomogeneities. Geophysical Prospecting54, 589-604.
  9. Taner, M T, Wagner, D E, Baysal, E, Lee, L. 1998, A unified method for 2-D and 3-D refraction statics. Geophysics63, 260-274.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2007ab108
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): GRM; RCS; refraction; statics; weathering
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error