1887
ASEG2007 - 19th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

The Enfield rock physics model was constructed to enable interpretation of the 2007 Enfield 4D monitor. The rock physics model links reservoir static and dynamic parameters to impedances. The model was based on a combination of log data from 5 wells in the field, laboratory core measurements taken from core on Enfield and neighbouring fields, and theoretical rock models from the literature. The reservoir is modelled by a sandshale mix. Sand properties are described using a modified critical porosity model whereas shale properties are generated from log data averaging. The dynamic properties in the model include saturation and pressure. Saturation is modelled using Gassmann’s formula assuming a homogeneous mixing. The reservoir sand velocity-pressure relationship was described by an empirical model fitted to dry core plug measurements. An assessment of the effect of uncertainty was included for both the saturation and pressure elements of the model. The resultant rock physics model was used prior to the acquisition of the monitor to assess the likelihood of measuring a 4D signal only 7 months after production start-up. Our modelling results indicated that the strong pressure build-up around the water injectors would result in a measurable 4D signal and this prediction was fulfilled by the successful 4D survey acquired in 2007. The rock physics model has been validated against the 4D monitor data and is being used to quantify the 4D interpretation, linking the observed 4D response back to predicted pressure and saturations in the field.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2007ab169
2007-12-01
2026-01-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Furre, A.K., Andersen, M., Moen, A.S., and Tønnessen, R.K., 2007, Sonic Log Derived Pressure Depletion Predictions and Application to Time-Lapse Seismic Interpretation, EAGE 69th Conference & Exhibition, London, Paper P077.
  2. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., and Dvorkin, J., 1998, The Rock Physic Handbook, Cambridge Univ. Press.
  3. Nes, O.-M., Holt, R.M., and Fjaer, E., 2000, The reliability of core data as input to seismic reservoir monitoring studies, Proc. SPE Europ. Petr. Conf., Paris, SPE paper No. 65180.
  4. Nur, A., Mavko, G., Dvorkin, J., and Gal, D., 1995, Critical porosity: The key to relating physical properties to porosity in rocks, Proc. 65th Ann. Int. Meeting, Soc. Expl. Geophys., 878.
  5. Ridsdill-Smith, T., Flynn, D., and Darling, S., 2007, Benefits of two-boat 4D acquisition, SEG 77th International Annual Meeting.
  6. Siggins, A.F & Dewhurst, D.N., 2003, Saturation, pore pressure and effective stress from sandstone acoustic properties, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, paper no. 1089.
  7. Smith, M., Gerhardt, A., Bourdon, L., Mee, B., 2007, Using 4D seismic data to understand production-related changes in Enfield, NWS Australia, this proceedings.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2007ab169
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Rock physics; time-lapse seismic.
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error