1887
ASEG2009 - 20th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Introduction

High resolution CT nowadays is a well established method for numerous industrial applications [Roth et al. 2003; Moller-Gunderson 2007; Nier et al. 2003] as well as for a wide range of research areas [Bonse 2004 and 2006]. During the last decade, Computed Tomography (CT) has progressed to higher resolution and faster reconstruction of the 3D-volume. Most recently it even allows a three-dimensional look into the inside of geological samples with submicron resolution. As shown by Brunke et al. [2008], nanoCT®-systems in pursuit of high resolution images, the potential, convenience and economy can now compete in many application fields with high cost and rare available synchrotron facilities.

Computed Tomography for geological purposes can lead to a new dimension of understanding of the distribution of rock properties. Especially spatial distribution of pores and pore-connections as well as cementation properties are of utmost importance in the evaluation of reservoir properties. Moreover rock analysis with the aid of X-ray Computed Tomography may lead to better analysis and prediction of well stimulation jobs. For example, a plug can be scanned before and after being stimulated with acid. The possibility to visualize the whole plug volume in a non-destructive way and to use the same plug for further analysis is undoubtedly currently the most valuable feature of this new type of rock analysis and will be a new area for routine application of X-ray Computed Tomography in the near future.

The paper will outline the hard- and software requirements for high resolution CT. It will showcase several geological applications which were performed with the nano tom, the first 180 kV nanofocus® CT system tailored specifically for highest-resolution scans of samples up to 120 mm in diameter and weighing up to 1 kg with exceptional voxel-resolutions down to <500 nm (<0.5 microns).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2009ab027
2009-12-01
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bonse, U. (Editor.), “Developments in X-Ray Tomography IV” SPIE, Wellingham WA, (2004).
  2. Bonse U., (Editor.), “Developments in X-Ray Tomography V”, SPIE, Wellingham WA, (2006).
  3. Brockdorf, K. et al., “Sub-micron CT: visualization of internal structures” in Developments in X-ray Tomography VI, edited by Stuart Stock, Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 7078, (2008).
  4. Oliver Brunke, Kathleen Brockdorf, Susanne Drews, Bert Müller, Tilman Donath, Julia Herzen and Felix Beckmann: „Comparison between x-ray tube-based and synchrotron radiation-based μCT” in Developments in X-Ray Tomography VI, edited by Stuart R. Stock, Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 7078, (2008).
  5. Feldkamp, L.A., Davis, L.C., Kress, JVV. ‘Practical cone-beam algorithm”, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1(6), 612-619 (1984).
  6. Nier, E., Roth, H., “Analysis of Crimp Interconnections by Microfocus Computed Tomography”, QZ, 9, 916-918 , (2003).
  7. Moller – Gunderson, D., “When 2D X-ray isn’t enough” SKIT, 8, (2007).
  8. Roth, H. Mazuik B., “What you can’t see can hurt you”, Quality Test and Inspection, 5, (2003).
  9. Withers, P., “X-ray nanotomography”, Materials Today, 10(12), 26-34 (2007)
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2009ab027
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 3D micro-analysis; high resolution X-ray Computed Tomography; nanoCT
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error