1887
ASEG2009 - 20th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:
PDF

Abstract

Introduction

The processing of two 3D land Perth basin seismic survey gave us the opportunity to apply and test some of die modem processing technologies available. The technologies we explore through those examples take place in the early steps of processing, later in the sequence before imaging and at die imaging level itself. For each of die steps we performed comparisons with more conventional technologies.

Especially with land data, often acquired with poor signal to noise ratio, it is important to remove noise in die early phases of the processing sequence. Groundroll in particular needs special attention as the characteristic features of Groundroll (low frequency, highly energy) noise in die data can hide near offset reflection data that contains important signal. In this article we review a new adaptive method for Groundroll attenuation that could potentially better attenuate noise and at the same time better preserve signal.

3D land datasets are also often characterized by a wide range of azimuths being present in the data. This differs from most 3D marine acquisitions that are (with the exception if multi and wide azimuth surveys) mostly acquired in a narrow azimuth fashion behind the boat even with the presence of a wide array of streamers. Those wide azimuths represent a challenge for conventionally sorted data regularization prior to imaging. In this article, we analyze die results of using offset vector tile (OVT) gathers regularization and OVT gathers in the imaging process against die more conventional offset volume method.

Finally, the use of Controlled Beam Migration (CBM) is compared to a more conventional Kirchhoff imaging process. Controlled Beam migration has often been used to image steep dips and provide multi arrivals in extremely complex environments. However in relatively low signal to noise ratio environment like die Perth basin we have seen in the second case study that this imaging technique could potentially bring better results than die conventional Kirchhoff.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2009ab032
2009-12-01
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Calvert, A., Jenner, E., Jefferson, R., Bloor, R., Adam, N., Ramkhelawan, R., and St Clair, C., 2008, Wide .Azimuth imaging and azimuthal velocity analysis using offset vector tile pre-stack migration, First Break, Volume 26, September 2008
  2. Cary, P. W., 1999, Common-offset-vector gathers: an alternative to cross-spreads for wide-azimuth 3-D surveys, 69th Ann. Internal Mtg. SEG, 18, 1496-1499, Expanded Abstracts
  3. Gary, S.H., Notfors, C., and Bleistein, N., 2002, Imaging using multi-arrivals: Gaussain beams or multi arrival Kirchhoff?, 72th .Ann. Internal Mtg. SEG, 21,1, 1117-1120, Expended Abstracts
  4. Hill, N.R., 2001, Pre-stack Gaussian beam depth migration, Geophysics, 52, 931-942
  5. Le Meur, D., Benjamin, N., Cole, R., and A1 Harty, M., 2008, Adaptive groundroll filtering, 70th EAGE Conference and Exhibition.
  6. Le Meur, D., Traonmilin, Y., 2008, Adaptive Noise Attenuation, 78th SEG, Expended Abstracts.
  7. Pica, A., 1997, Fast and accurate finite-difference solutions of the 3D eikonal equation parametrized in celerity, 72th Ann. Intemat. Mtg. SEG, 16, 1774 Expanded Abstracts
  8. Poole, G., and Hermann, P., 2007, Multi-dimentional data regularization for modem acquisition geometries, 76th Ann. Intemat. Mtg. SEG
  9. Sun, J., Pham, D., Sun, J., Tang, Q., Bone, G., and Giang, N.T., 2007, Imaging of fractures and faults inside granite basement using controlled beam migration, ASEG 19th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition
  10. Vermeer, G.J.O., 2007, Reciprocal offset-vector tiles in various acquisition geometries, 77th Ann. Intemat. Mtg. SEG
  11. Vermeer, G.J.O., 2003, 3D seismic survey design optimization, The leading edge, October 2003
  12. Vinje, V., Roberts, G., and Taylor, R., 2008, Controlled Beam Migration, a versatile structural tool, First Break, Volume 26, September 2008
  13. Xu, S., Zhang, Y., Pham, D., Lambare, G.,2005, Antileakage Fourier transform for seismic data regularization, Geophysics, Vol. 70, No 4, V87-V95
  14. Zwartjes, P., and Gisolf, D., 2002, Fourier reconstruction: Data weighting and comparisons with other methods: Delphi Acquisiion and Preprocessing, 5, 25-46
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2009ab032
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 3D; Imaging; Land; Seismic processing
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error