1887
ASEG2009 - 20th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Abstract

We present an example of the use of a software framework that combines 3D geological mapping and geophysical modelling. This approach would be relevant in a wide range of applications, from regional geological mapping, groundwater studies, through to mineral or geothermal prospecting. In this instance, we illustrate a typical workflow with a case study involving the San Nicolas VMS deposit and surrounding region. An initial 3D geological map, based on sparse surface geological observations, is progressively refined using AEM and potential field modelling results. At each stage, the geological map is used to capture and communicate the inferred distribution of map units. During the latter stages of interpretation, the geological map is also used to provide constraints for potential field modelling. In addition to the opportunity for direct detection of highly conductive basement-hosted sulphide mineralisation, the availability of AEM data proved crucial in the San Nicolas example in that we were able to use these data to determine the thickness of a moderately conductive transported cover unit. This significantly reduced the ambiguity of subsequent potential field interpretations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2009ab043
2009-12-01
2026-01-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blakely, R. J., and Jachens, R. C., 1991, Regional study of mineral resources in Nevada: insights from three-dimensional analysis of gravity anomalies: GSA Bulletin, 103, 795-803.
  2. Guillen, A., Courrioux, G., Calcagno, P., Lane, R., Lees, T., and Mclnemey, P., 2004, Constrained gravity 3D litho-inversion applied to Broken Hill: Extended Abstract, ASEG 17th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, August 2004, Sydney.
  3. Jachens, R. C., and Moring, B. C., 1990, Maps of the thickness of Cenozoic deposits and the isostatic residual gravity over basement for Nevada: USGS Open-File Report 90-404, scale 1:1,000,000.
  4. Johnson, B. J., Montante-Martinez, J. A., Canela-Barboza, M., and Danielson, T. J., 2000, Geology of the San Nicolas deposit, Zacatecas, Mexico: In VMS deposits of Latin .America (eds. Sherlock, R., and Logan, M. A. V.), G.A.C. Mineral Deposits Division Special Publication, No. 2, 71-86.
  5. Lane, R., Fitzgerald, D., Guillen, A., Seikel, R., and Mclnemey, P., 2007, Lithologically constrained inversion of magnetic and gravity data sets: Preview, Issue 129, 11-13 and 17.
  6. Nieto-Samaniego, A. F., Alaniz-Alvarez, S. A., and Campmbi, A., 2007, Mesa Central of Mexico: Stratigraphy, structure and Cenozoic evolution: GSA Special Paper 422, 41-70.
  7. Parker, R. L., 1972, The rapid calculation of potential anomalies: Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 31, 447-455.
  8. Phillips, N., 2002, Geophysical inversion in an integrated exploration program: Examples from the San Nicolas Deposit: Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, UBC.
  9. Phillips, N., Oldenburg, D. W., Chen, J., Li, Y., and Routh, P., 2001, Cost-ed ectiveness of geophysical inversions in mineral exploration: Applications at San Nicolas: The Leading Edge, Vol. 20, No. 12, 1351-1360.
  10. Phillips, N., and Oldenburg, D. W., 2002, Geophysical inversion in an integrated mineral exploration program: examples from the San Nicolas deposit: Expanded Abstract, SEG Annual Meeting.
  11. Saltus, R. W., and Jachens, R. C., 1991, Gravity and basin depth maps for the Basin and Range province, western United States: USGS Geophysical Map GP-1012, scale 1:2,500,000, interpretive text.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2009ab043
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 3D; AEM; gravity; magnetic; Mexico.; Modelling; San Nicolas
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error