1887
ASEG2012 - 22nd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

The effect of single-phase fluid saturation on a rock’s bulk modulus is well understood using Gassmann’s equation. However when multiple fluids are involved the behaviour is not as well understood. Several fluid mixing averages have been suggested (Voigt, Reuss, Hill), and each apply in certain situations, however it is often not clear which model to select in a specific scenario and in some scenarios none of the models are accurate. The critical factor in deciding which average to use depends on the way the fluids are spatially distributed within the rock. We have applied elastic finite difference computational modelling to many different fluid distribution scenarios and have replicated behaviour described by various theoretical, empirical and lab data results, as well as generating results that span the space between these models. Importantly, our results compare well with observations in lab experiments, without relying on poroelastic or squirt-flow models which require parameters that are difficult to estimate for real reservoirs. Our elastic scattering approach is less computationally expensive than poroelastic modelling and can be more easily applied to actual reservoir rock and fluid distributions. Our results provide us with a powerful new method to analyse and predict the effects of multiple fluids and ‘patchy’ saturation on saturated rock bulk moduli and velocity. They also challenge traditional assumptions about the controlling factors on saturated bulk moduli suggesting it is more dominantly affected by the spatial fluid distribution properties rather than pore-scale fluid flow effects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab065
2012-12-01
2026-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akbar, N., Mavko, G., Nur, A., and Dvorkin, J., 1994, Seismic Signatures of Reservoir Transport Properties and Pore Fluid Distribution: Geophysics 59, 1222-36.
  2. Biot, M.A., 1956, Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid-Saturated Porous Solid. II. Higher Frequency Range: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 28, 179-91.
  3. Brie, A., Pampuri, F., Marsala, A.F., and Meazza, O., 1995, Shear Sonic Interpretation in Gas-Bearing Sands. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.
  4. Cadoret, T., Marion, D., and Zinszner, B., 1995, Influence of Frequency and Fluid Distribution on Elastic Wave Velocities in Partially Saturated Limestones: Journal of Geophysical Research 100, 9789-803.
  5. Domenico, S.N., 1976, Effect of Brine-Gas Mixture on Velocity in an Unconsolidated Sanreservoir: Geophysics 41, 882-94.
  6. Gassmann, F., 1951, On the Elasticity of Porous Media: Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 96, 1-23.
  7. Hill, R., 1963, Elastic Properties of Reinforced Solids: Some Theoretical Principles: Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 11, 357-72.
  8. Lebedev, M., Toms-Stewart, J., Clennell, B., Pervukhina, M., Shulakova, V., Paterson, L., Muller, T.M., Gurevich, B., and Wenzlau, F., 2009, Direct Laboratory Observation of Patchy Saturation and Its Effects on Ultrasonic Velocities: The Leading Edge 28, 24-27.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab065
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): elastic modelling; partial saturation; patchy
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error