1887
ASEG2012 - 22nd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

The Earth’s upper crust hosts many important economic resources, from minerals to groundwater to energy, but the subsurface structure and associated thermal structure is poorly understood. Internal heat is the driving force behind many of the Earth’s processes and is now being considered as a new form of clean renewable energy. High resolution 3D thermal models, incorporating detailed geological structure and real world data, are effective in assessing thermal structure and provide improved temperature estimates for geothermal exploration. Unlike historical 1D models and extrapolated temperature at depth maps, 3D thermal models are appealing to the geothermal exploration industry as they are not limited by the sparse nature of down-hole temperature measurements or heat flow and the uncertainties of such models can be calculated.

In the Sydney-Gunnedah-Bowen Basin (SGBB) system, Australia’s energy rich sedimentary basin, the thermal structure is poorly understood resulting in its geothermal potential largely being ignored. Thermal modelling using optimised parameters shows estimated temperatures at 5km below the surface, the economic limit of drilling, to range from 120°C to 240°C, with highest temperatures under thick sediments with multiple insulating coal layers. Using the 150°C temperature contour as in indicator for potential geothermal prospectivity, the most potential basins are in the Bowen and Sydney.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab091
2012-12-01
2026-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Budd, A., Holgate, F., Gerner, E., and Ayling, B., 2008, Precompetative geoscience for geothermal exploration and developmen in Australia: Geoscience Australia’s Onshore Energy Sercurity Program and the Geothermal Energy Project: GRC Transactions 32, 347-350.
  2. Chopra, P., and Holgate, F., 2006, A GIS analysis of temperature in the Australian crust: Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress, Turkey, Abstracts.
  3. Clauser, C., and Huenges, E., 1995, Thermal conductivity of rocks and minerals – Rock Physics and Phase Relations, A handbook of physical constraints: Americal Geophysical Union.
  4. Danis, C., O’Neill, C., and Lackie, M., 2010, Gunnedah Basin 3D architecture and upper crustal temperatures: Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 57, 483-505.
  5. Danis, C., O’Neill, C., Lackie, M., Twigg, L., and Danis, A., 2011, Deep 3D structure of the Sydney Basin using gravity modelling: Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 58, 517-542.
  6. Gerner, E., and Holgate, F., 2010, OzTemp – Interpreted temperature at 5km depth image: Geoscience Australia.
  7. Mussons, A., Harrison, B., Gordon, K., Wright, S., Sandiford, M., 2009, Thermal thinking: optimal targeting for Australian geothermal explorers: Proceedings Australian Geothermal Energy Conference, Brisbane, Record 2009/35.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab091
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): geothermal potential; Sydney-Gunnedah-Bowen Basin; thermal structure.
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error