1887
ASEG2012 - 22nd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

The general aim of seismic surveying is to map the subsurface in as much detail as possible, subject to economic constraints. As technology has developed so has the ability to acquire and process larger amounts of data. This often translates to acquisition of larger offsets, potentially increasing the fold and signal-to-noise ratio of the stack.

Far-offset traces are subject to non-hyperbolic NMO, which may be handled by incorporating higher-order anisotropic terms. However, even if far-offset nonhyperbolic events can be flattened, they are likely to suffer from NMO stretch. This can result in a serious reduction in dominant frequency, and hence in vertical resolution. Several techniques have been published which apply NMO to P-wave data without introducing stretch. We have focused on extending one of these techniques through analysis of modelled and production data.

We have also extended the analysis to include convertedwave (PS) data, where NMO stretch can have even greater impact. For PS surveys, reflections on the near offsets have lower amplitude and are often swamped by noise. Therefore, most of the data contributing to the stack are from the mid to far offsets, particularly at the shallower coal scale. The dominant frequency of PS data can be significantly reduced by NMO stretch. This may be one of the factors that contribute to the poorer than expected resolution observed on some PS imagery.

Both the P and PS non-stretch NMO algorithms developed in this investigation successfully incorporate anisotropic parameters to accommodate non-hyperbolic NMO effects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab092
2012-12-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Buchholtz H., 1972, A note on signal distortion due to dynamic (NMO) corrections. Geophysical Prospecting, 20, 395-402
  2. Denham, J., Denham, L., 2011, The history of seismic resolution. Preview, 150, 33-36
  3. Dunkin j., Levin F., 1973, Effect of normal moveout on a seismic pulse. Geophysics, 38, 635-642
  4. Macleod M., Hanson R., Hadley M., Reynolds K., Lumley D., Mchugo S., Probert T. 1999. The Alba field OBC seismic survey. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 18, 725-727.
  5. Shatilo, A., Aminzadeh, F., 2000, Constant normal-moveout (CNMO) correction: a technique and test results. Geophysical Prospecting, 48, 473-488
  6. Strong, S., Hearn, S., 2008, Multi-component seismicresolution analysis using finite-difference acquisition modelling. Exploration Geophysics, 39, 189-197
  7. Thomsen, L., 2002, Understanding seismic anisotropy in exploration and exploitation, SEG Distinguished Instructor Short Course, Tulsa, USA
  8. Velseis. 2003. Final Report - #C10020: Converted-wave seismic reflection for improved resolution of coal structures. ACARP Report, C10020
  9. Velseis. 2007. Final Report - #C13029: Integrated P/PS seismic imaging for improved geological characterisation of coal environments. ACARP Report, C13029
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab092
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Anisotropy.; Constant NMO; NMO stretch; PS wave
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error