1887
ASEG2012 - 22nd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

Magnetic field data are of fundamental importance in many areas of geophysical exploration with 3D voxel inversion being a common aid to their interpretation. In the majority of voxel based inversions it is assumed that the magnetic response arises entirely from magnetic induction. However, in the last decade, several studies have found that remanent magnetization is far more prevalent than previously thought. Our experience with numerous minerals exploration projects confirms that the presence of non-induced magnetization is the rule rather than the exception in base metals exploration.

In this work we show that failure to accommodate for remanent magnetization in 3D voxel-based inversion can lead to misleading interpretations. We present a technique we call Magnetization Vector Inversion (MVI), which incorporates both remanent and induced magnetization without prior knowledge of the direction or strength of remanent magnetization. We demonstrate our inversion using model studies and field data. Successful application to numerous minerals exploration surveys confirms that incorporating remanent magnetization is essential for the correct interpretation of magnetic field data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab117
2012-12-01
2026-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Butler, R. F., 1992, Paleomagnetism: magnetic domains to geologie terranes, Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  2. Kubota, R., and Uchiyama A., 2005, Three-dimensional magnetization vector inversion of a seamount, Earth Planets Space, 57, 691-699
  3. Li, Y., and D. W. Oldenburg, 3-D inversion of magnetic data, Geophysics, 61, 1996, 394-408.
  4. Lelièvre, P. G., and Oldenburg, D. W., 2009, A 3D total magnetization inversion applicable when significant, complicated remanence is present, Geophysics, 74, L21-L30
  5. McEnroe, S. A., Fabian, K., Robinson, P., Gaina, C., Brown, L., 2009, Crustal Magnetism, Lamellar Magnetism and Rocks that Remember, Elements, 5, 241-246.
  6. Pilkington, M., 1997, 3-D magnetic imaging using conjugate gradients, Geophysics, 62, 1132-1142.
  7. Rutherford, N. F., Lawrance, L. M., and Sparks, G., 2005, Osborne Cu-Au Deposit, Clonclurry, North West Queensland, CRC LEME Report.
  8. Shearer, S., and Y. Li, 2004, 3D Inversion of magnetic total gradient data in the presence of remanent magnetization: 74th Annual Meeting, SEG, Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 23, 774-777.
  9. Silva, J. B. C., Medeiros, W. E., and Barbosa, V. C. F., 2001, Potential-field inversion: Choosing the appropriate technique to solve a geologic problem, Geophysics, 66, 511 - 520.
  10. Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., Sherriff, R. E., and Keys, D. A., 1990, Applied Geophysics, Cambridge University Press.
  11. Tullemans, F. J., Agnew P., and Voulgaris, P., 2001, The Role of Geology and Exploration Wiithin the Mining Cycle at the Osborne Mine, NW Queensland, in Monograph 23 - Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Estimation - The AuslMM Guide to Good Practice, Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, 157-168.
  12. Zdhanov, M. S., 2002, Geophysical Inverse Theory and Regularization Problems, Method in Geochemistry and Geophysics 36, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  13. Zhdanov, M. S., and Portniaguine, O., 2002, 3-D magnetic inversion with data compression and image focusing, Geophysics, 67, 1532-1541
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab117
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 3D; inversion; magnetization vector inversion.; remanent magnetization
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error