1887
ASEG2012 - 22nd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

Offshore exploration for hydrocarbons in increasingly challenging environments often requires more advanced acquisition methods than conventional 3D narrowazimuth towed streamer to better image the sub-surface for AVO analysis and reservoir characterization. Multi- Azimuth (MAZ), Wide-Azimuth (WAZ) or Full-Azimuth (FAZ) seismic acquisition overcomes the limitations of the conventional acquisition in better illuminating the sub-surface, suppressing the multiple and enhancing signal to noise (S/N) ratio. Nevertheless, to realize the added value of multi-azimuth data, the data need to be combined in a way that will overcome the issues such as time-shift and amplitude difference due to varied illumination between the surveys.

This paper describes a method that can be used for combining MAZ pre-stack data to generate AVOpreserving common image gathers (CIGs) in the presence of poor illumination. Based on the concept of crosscorrelation, MAZ CIGs are first flattened to account for any inaccuracy in the velocity model and imaging process so as to align the events to a pilot. Repeating the crosscorrelation process, weights are then derived from the correlation coefficients and applied to individual offsets that take into account the AVO behaviour. With this post-migration processing, any anomaly in AVO resulted from poor illumination can be mitigated. Applying it on MAZ post-stack data, the method can also provide optimal stacking for obtaining higher S/N images.

We demonstrate, through synthetic and real data examples, that clearer images with high AVO fidelity can be obtained from MAZ data using our optimal stacking method.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab122
2012-12-01
2026-01-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barley, B. and Summers, T., 2007, Multi-azimuth and wideazimuth seismic: Shallow to deep water, exploration to production: The Leading Edge, 26(4), 450-458.
  2. Hung, B., Zhang, F.M., Sun, J., Stanley, M. and Osadchuk A., 2006. An Automated 3D Method for Azimuthal Anisotropy Analysis in Marine Seismic Data: 70th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts, H035.
  3. Keggin, J., Manning, T., Rietveld, W., Page, C., Fromyr, E. and Van Borselen R., 2006. Key aspects of Multi-Azimuth acquisition and processing: 76th Meeting, SEG, New Orleans, Expanded Abstracts, 2886-2889.
  4. Manning, T., Page, C., Hall, S.A., Keggin, J., Barley, B., Rietveld, W., Fromyr, E. and Van Borselen R., 2008. Leveraging the Value of Multi-azimuth (MAZ) Seismic through MAZ-stack: 70th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts, G013.
  5. Zhou, B., Zhou, J., Wang, Z. L., Guo, Y. H., Xie,Y. and Ye, G. Y., 2011, Anisotropic depth imaging with High Fidelity Controlled Beam Migration: a case study in Bohai, offshore China: 81st Meeting, SEG, San Antonio, Expanded Abstracts, 217-221.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab122
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Multi-azimuth; stacking.
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error