1887
ASEG2012 - 22nd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

Seismic images of the earth’s interior can be significantly distorted by complex wave propagation effects arising from 3D structural velocity variations, combined with the presence of azimuthal velocity anisotropy within some of the rock layers. Most image processing techniques attempt to separate and compensate for both of these phenomena sequentially; they rarely address both simultaneously. These approaches implicitly assume that the effects of 3D structural velocity and azimuthal anisotropy are separable, when in fact both effects are coupled together in the seismic data. The presence of strong azimuthal velocity anisotropy can lead to significant errors in estimated seismic velocity and degraded quality of subsurface images, especially for large source-receiver offsets, wide azimuths and steep geologic dips. Such imaging errors can greatly increase the uncertainty associated with exploring, characterizing, developing and monitoring subsurface geologic features for hydrocarbons, geothermal energy, CO sequestration, and other important geophysical imaging applications. Our approach is to simultaneously address velocity structure and azimuthal anisotropy by development of an elliptic dip moveout (DMO) operator. We combine the structural-velocity insensitivity of isotropic DMO with elliptic moveout representative of azimuthal velocity anisotropy. Forward and adjoint elliptical DMO operators are then cascaded together to form a single elliptical moveout (EMO) operation, which has a skewed saddlelike impulse response that resembles an isotropic azimuthal moveout operator. The EMO operator can be used as a prestack data conditioner, to estimate azimuthal anisotropy in a domain that is relatively insensitive to 3D velocity structure, or to compensate and map the data back to its original prestack domain in its approximately equivalent isotropic wavefield form. We show that EMO can reduce structural dip image errors of 10-20º or more for realistic azimuthal anisotropy values at far offsets.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab162
2012-12-01
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, J., and I. Tsvankin, 1997, Dip-moveout processing by Fourier transform in anisotropic media: Geophysics, 62, 1260-1269.
  2. Biondi, B., S. Fomel, and N. Chemingui, 1998, Azimuth moveout for 3D prestack imaging: Geophysics, 63, 574-588.
  3. Bishop, K., A. Osadchuk, and M. Stanley, 2010, Analysis methodology for azimuthal anisotropy: 72nd EAGE Meeting.
  4. Boness, N., and M. Zoback, 2004, Stress-induced seismic velocity anisotropy and physical properties in the SAFOD pilot hole in Parkfield, CA: Geophysical Research Letters, 31, L15S17.
  5. Clapp, R., 2006, AMO inversion to a common azimuth dataset: 79th SEG Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 2097-2101.
  6. Dickinson, D., and T. Ridsdill-Smith, 2010, The benefits of multi-azimuth depth migration over the Tidepole field, northwest shelf, Australia: 72nd EAGE Meeting.
  7. Jenner, E., 2009, Data example and modelling study of Pwave azimuthal anisotropy potentially caused by isotropic velocity heterogeneity: First Break, 27(2), 45-50.
  8. Koren, Z., I. Ravve, and R. Levy, 2010, Moveout approximation for horizontal transversely isotropic and vertical transversely isotropic layered medium. Part I: Effective model: Geophysical Prospecting, 58, 599-617.
  9. O’Connell, J., M. Kohli, and S. Amos, 1993, Bullwinkle: A unique 3-D experiment: Geophysics, 58(1), 167-176.
  10. Sicking, C., and S. Nelan, 2009, Offset and aperture requirements for azimuth parameter estimation using azimuth migration scanning: 82nd SEG Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1157-1161.
  11. Uren, N., G. Gardner, and J. A. McDonald, 1990, Dip moveout in anisotropic media: Geophysics, 55, 863-867.
  12. Williams, M., and E. Jenner, 2002, Interpreting seismic data in the presence of azimuthal anisotropy; or azimuthal anisotropy in the presence of the seismic interpretation: The Leading Edge, 21, 771-774.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab162
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): and azimuthal anisotropy; data processing; Imaging; prestack; seismic
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error