1887
ASEG2012 - 22nd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

Time-lapse analysis of seismic data acquired at different stages of hydrocarbon production or fluid/gas injection has been very successful at capturing detailed reservoir changes (e.g., pressure, saturation, fluid flow). Conventional 4D analysis is performed in the time domain assuming a constant baseline model; however, this procedure becomes difficult when the subsurface is significantly altered by production/injection and large time anomalies and complex 4D coda are recorded. We argue that a more robust 4D analysis procedure in these situations requires iterative wave-equation depth imaging and time-lapse velocity analysis.

Wave-equation depth migration requires accurate knowledge of the velocity field usually obtained by one of two ways. First, data-space methods are where recorded data are matched to those calculated through a background velocity model. Differences between the two datasets are used in tomographic backprojections to generate velocity model updates. Alternatively, imagespace methods are where discrepancies between migrated images (non-flat gathers) are backprojected to estimate velocity model updates. These types of approaches are termed migration velocity analysis (MVA).

This abstract focuses on extending 3D wave-equation MVA (WEMVA) approaches to time-lapse velocity analysis. We discuss the differences between 3D and 4D WEMVA inversion goals, and how we leverage the locality of 4D image perturbations to provide highresolution velocity model updates. We demonstrate the utility of 4D WEMVA analysis in a synthetic CO geosequestration experiment by successfully inverting for a velocity perturbation corresponding to a thin layer (<20m) of injected CO in a typical North Sea reservoir.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab197
2012-12-01
2026-01-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albertin, U., P. Sava, J. Etgen, and M. Maharramov, 2006, Adjoint wave-equation velocity analysis: SEG Expanded Abstracts, 25, 3009-3013.
  2. Anderson, R. N., A. Boulanger, W. He, L. Xu, P. B. Flemings, T. D. Burkhart, and A. R. Hoover, 1997, 4-D time-lapse seismic monitoring in the south Timbalier 295 field, Gulf of Mexico: SEG Expanded Abstracts, 18, 868-871.
  3. Biondi, B., and P. Sava, 1999, Wave-equation migration velocity analysis: SEG Expanded Abstracts, 20, 1723–1726.
  4. Gauthier, O., J. Virieux, and A. Tarantola, 1986, Twodimensional nonlinear inversion of seismic waveforms - Numerical results: Geophysics, 51, 1387-1403.
  5. Girard, A., and I. Vasconcelos, 2010, Image-domain timelapse inversion with extended images, SEG Expanded Abstracts, 29, 4200-4203.
  6. Greaves, R. J., T. J. and Fulp, 1987, Three-dimensional seismic monitoring of an enhanced oil recovery process: Geophysics, 52, 1175-1187.
  7. Jenkins, S. D., M. W. Waite, and M. F. Bee, 1997, Time-lapse monitoring of the Duri steamflood: A pilot and case study: The Leading Edge, 16, 1267-1273.
  8. Johnston, D. H., R. S. McKenny, J. Verbeek, and J. Almond, 1998, Time-lapse seismic analysis of Fulmar Field: The Leading Edge, 17, 1420-1428.
  9. Lumley, D. E., 1995, Seismic time-lapse monitoring of subsurface fluid flow: Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.
  10. Lumley, D. E., R. A. Behren, and Z. Wang, 1997, Assessing the technical risk of a 4-D seismic project: The Leading Edge, 16, 1287-1291.
  11. Lumley, D.E., D. Adams, R. Wright, D. Markus, and S. Cole, 2008, Seismic monitoring of CO2 geo-sequestration: realistic capabilities and limitations: SEG Expanded Abstracts, 27, 2841-2845.
  12. Pratt, R. G., 1999, Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, Part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model: Geophysics, 64, 888-901.
  13. Sava, P., and B. Biondi, 2004, Wave-equation migration velocity analysis - I: Theory: Geophysical Prospecting, 52, 593-606.
  14. Sava, P., and I. Vlad, 2008, Numeric implementation of waveequation migration velocity analysis operators: Geophysics, 73, no 5., VE145-VE159.
  15. Shen, P., W. Symes, S. Morton, and H. Calandra, 2005, Differential semblance velocity analysis via shot profile migration: SEG Expanded Abstracts, 24, 2249–2252.
  16. Sirgue, L., and R. Pratt, 2004, Efficient waveform inversion and imaging: A strategy for selecting temporal frequencies: Geophysics, 69, 231-24.
  17. Walls, J. D., J. Dvorkin, and B. A. Smith, 1998, Modeling seismic velocity in Ekofisk Chalk: SEG Expanded Abstracts, 19, 1016–1019.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab197
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 4D; and velocity; inversion; prestack; seismic
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error