1887
ASEG2012 - 22nd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

3D P-wave seismic surveys can exhibit significant azimuthal variation in stacking velocities, and failure to allow for such variations can introduce smearing into the stacked volume. The problem is likely to be worse in the case of converted-wave (PS) reflection. Firstly, S-waves have lower velocities such that time variations are amplified. Secondly, PS rays are asymmetrical, such that anomalous features may be traversed by different wavetypes (P or S), depending on the direction of travel.

Recently, a coal-scale 3D-PS trial was recorded in the Bowen Basin with the aim of providing a detailed investigation of such azimuthal variation. The survey was designed with extremely high fold (>500). This allowed good quality images to be constructed for data subsets having restricted ray azimuths. Target structures interpreted using different ray-azimuths exhibit significant timing variations (up to 30ms). The observed azimuthal variations may not necessarily indicate true azimuthal anisotropy. They can result from poor statics solutions, and PS imagery is notorious for difficult statics.

On the other hand, the observed variations may be indicative of true geological anisotropy. Based on shearwave splitting models, our PS velocity variations have been modelled in terms of elliptical variation with azimuth, and this approach predicts the orientation of the horizontal stress field. It is interesting that a majority of our data zones indicate a consistent stress orientation. Furthermore, the interpreted horizontal-stress orientation is consistent with observed reverse faulting in the area.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab224
2012-12-01
2026-01-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Crampin S., Evans R., Ucer B., Doyle M., Davis J.P., Yegorkina G.V., Miller A. 1980. Observations of dilatancyinduced polarisation anomalies and earthquake prediction. Nature, 286, 874-877.
  2. Crampin S., Lovwell J. H. 1991. A decade of shear-wave splitting in the Earth's crust: What does it mean? What use can we make of it? And what should we do next? Geophys J. Internat, 107, 387-407.
  3. Crampin S., 1997. Going APE: I ‐ Modeling the inherent anisotropy of intact rock. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 16, 952- 955.
  4. Gander W., Golub G.H., Strebel R., 1994, Least-Squares Fitting of Circles and Ellipses, BIT Numerical Mathematics, Springer
  5. Thomsen L., 1999, Converted-wave reflection seismology over inhomogeneous, anisotropic media. Geophysics 64, 678- 690
  6. Velseis. 2007. Final Report - #C13029: Integrated P/PS seismic imaging for improved geological characterisation of coal environments. ACARP Report, C13029
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab224
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 3D.; Azimuthal anisotropy; Fracture detection; PS wave
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error