1887
ASEG2012 - 22nd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

The goal of geophysical inversion of electromagnetic (EM) data is to recover a model of the geoelectrical properties of the sub-surface. The standard practice for 1D inversion of marine controlled source EM (CSEM) data is to generate smooth conductivity models using least squares (L-norm) methods. However, sedimentary geology is stratified and piece-wise continuous. As such, smooth resistivity models cannot represent this character. In response to this inconsistency, a means was sought to generate more geologically plausible, piece-wise continuous models.

The common approach in the literature when generating piece-wise continuous inversion models is to regularize L-norm methods in such a manner as to induce blocky behaviour. Although effective, these techniques are selfconflictive; forcing non-smooth behaviour from an implicitly smooth algorithm. In contrast, L-norm inversion inherently produces piece-wise continuous models. To investigate the possible utility of this approach, a L1-norm inversion algorithm has been developed and tested on synthetic and real datasets. The L-norm results were compared with those generated using an industry standard L-norm algorithm.

The synthetic inversions focused on previously published examples. The real data inversions focused on electric and magnetic field measurements recorded over the main reservoir sand of the Pluto gas field in block WA350-P, North West Shelf, WA.

The L-norm inversions recovered, to within the resolution limits of the CSEM method, the depth, thickness and resistivity of the synthetic geological models and the Pluto-1 resistivity well log, whilst fitting the input data to within noise. When compared against the L-norm profiles, the L-norm inversion more closely represented the stratified character of the sedimentary sequence. It was therefore concluded that L-norm inversion is an attractive alternative to smooth L-norm methods when blocky inversion models are desired.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab229
2012-12-01
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Christensen, N. B., and K. Dodds, 2007, 1D inversion and resolution analysis of marine CSEM data: Geophysics, 72, 27- 38.
  2. Constable, S.C., R. L. Parker, and C. G. Constable, 1987, Occam’s inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data: Geophysics, 52, 289-300.
  3. Fullagar, P. K., and D. W. Oldenburg, 1984, Inversion of horizontal loop electromagnetic frequency sounds: Geophysics, 49, 150-164.
  4. Godber, N., 2010, Minimum L1-Norm inversion of Marine Controlled Source EM data: Unpublished B.Sc.Hons. thesis, University of Queensland.
  5. Key, K., 2009, 1D inversion of multicomponent, multifrequency marine CSEM data: Methodology and synthetic studies for resolving thin resistive layers: Geophysics, 74, 9-20.
  6. Key, K., and A. Lockwood, 2010, Determining the orientations of marine CSEM receivers using orthogonal procrustes rotation analysis: Geophysics, 75, 63-70.
  7. Wicklund, T.A., 2007, Seabed Logging Processing Report: Flanders, NWS Australia. EMGS
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab229
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 1D; CSEM; inversion; L1
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error