1887
ASEG2012 - 22nd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

Understanding the impact of bathymetry can be a critical in application of the marine controlled source electromagnetic methods. Electromagnetic field strength and direction can be affected by small changes in water column depth. The bathymetry, the air-water interface and sub-surface resistivity variations will all contribute to any single electromagnetic measurement. In such complex geo-electric settings a deeper understanding of how and where each feature is expressed in the electromagnetic response is required. We compute the electromagnetic fields for a model with complex bathymetry and a hydrocarbon target. We compute the response with and without hydrocarbon to investigate the effect of bathymetry. A 2.5D finite element algorithm was used to forward model the MCSEM response. The interaction of the electromagnetic fields with the target and the bathymetry can be appreciated by viewing electric and magnetic streamlines. A key benefit of using streamlines is that they quickly show where the electric or magnetic fields would be most strongly altered by the target or alternatively by bathymetry. This aids both interpretation and survey design.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab242
2012-12-01
2026-01-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AMIRA International, 2011, p223 - EM Modelling Software, http://www.amirainternational.com/WEB/site.asp?section=news&page=projectpages/p223f_software, [Accessed January 25, 2011].
  2. Chen, J. and Alumbaugh, D., 2009, Three methods for mitigating airwaves in shallow water marine CSEM data: 79th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstract, 534–538.
  3. Davydycheva S. and Ryhklinski N. I., 2010, 3D Modeling of Novel Focused Source EM Survey versus the Standard CSEM, Progress in Electromagnetics Research, Symposium Proceedings 2010, 607 - 612.
  4. Han, N., Nam, M., Kim, H., 2010, An Analysis on 3d Marine Csem Responses Based on a Finite Difference Method, American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2010.
  5. Harris, B., Pethick, A., 2008, Marine controlled source electromagnetic methods for hydrocarbon exploration, Preview, 137,30-34.
  6. Hesthammer, J., Stefatos, A., Boulaenko, M., Vereshagin, A., Gelting, P., Wedberg, T. and Maxwell, G., 2010,, CSEM technology as a value driver for hydrocarbon exploration, Marine and Petroleum Geology, Volume 27, Issue 9, October 2010, Pages 1872-1884, ISSN 0264-8172, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.08.001.
  7. Key, K., 2009, 1D inversion of multicomponent, multifrequency marine CSEM data: Methodology and synthetic studies for resolving thin resistive layers: Geophysics, 74, P9 - P20.
  8. Li, Y. and Constable, S., 2007, 2D marine controlled-source electromagnetic modeling: Part 2 - The effect of bathymetry, Geophysics 72.
  9. Pethick, 2011, CSEMoMatic Open Soure Electromagnetic Modelling Software, http://www.MCSEM.com, accessed 19th, August 2011.
  10. Phillips, S., 2007, Feasibility of the marine controlled source electromagnetic method for hydrocarbon exploration; Western Australia: BSc Honours thesis, Department of Exploration Geophysics, Curtin University of Technology.
  11. Zhdanov, M.S. and Čuma, M., 2009, Electromagnetic migration of marine CSEM data in areas with rough Bathymetry. 79th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstract 28, 684.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab242
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Air Wave; Bathymetry; MCSEM; Streamlines
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error