1887
ASEG2012 - 22nd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

Aquifer influx and pressure depletion are key variables during the production and development of a natural gas field. To obtain an understanding of how aquifer influx and pressure depletion varies across the reservoir, remote geophysical monitoring techniques are commonly used, particularly in offshore environments where well data is geographically sparse. The seafloor time-lapse gravity technique is a candidate technique for remote reservoir monitoring of water influx into producing gas fields in the Northern Carnarvon Basin.

We have developed a method to quickly assess the sensitivity of time lapse gravity measurements to water influx or pressure depletion using a vertical cylinder model for gas reservoirs. In strong water-drive gas reservoirs, a field-wide height change in the gas-water contact greater than 5m may produce a detectable gravity response depending on the reservoir depth and rock quality. In depletion-drive gas reservoirs, large pressure changes between 6MPa (~870psia) throughout the reservoir can produce a detectable response. Applying this technique to Carnarvon Basin gas fields where the primary reservoir is the Mungaroo Formation suggests that gravity monitoring of production related changes may be feasible but needs to be assessed on a field-by-field basis.

The method employed is both flexible and practical. It can be used in a range of applications, and provides a quick assessment of the feasibility of time-lapse monitoring of subsurface density changes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab251
2012-12-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Batzle, M. & Wang, Z. 1992. Seismic properties of pore fluids. Geophysics, 57, 1396-1408.
  2. Conroy, T., Seggie, R. J., Clayton, C., Rayfield, M. A. & Johnson, G. A. 2008. Focused data acquisition strategy aids pluto field reservoir characterisation. SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition. Perth, Australia: SPE 117003.
  3. Dake, L. P. 1983. Fundamentals of reservoir engineering: Developments in petroleum science 8, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.
  4. Gassmann, F. 1951. Elastic waves through a packing of spheres. Geophysics, 16, 673-685.
  5. Himmelblau, D. M. & Riggs, J. B. 2004. Basic Principles and Calculations in Chemical Engineering, upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference.
  6. Jenkins, C. C., Chiquito, R. M., Glenton, P. N., Mills, A. A., Mcpherson, J., Schapper, M. C. & Williams, M. A. 2008. Reservoir Definition at the Jansz/Io Gas Field, NW Shelf, Australia: A Case Study of an Integrated Project from Exploration to Development. International Petroleum Technology Conference. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  7. Land, C. S. 1971. Comparison of Calculated with Experimental Imbibition Relative Permeability. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 11.
  8. Lumley, D. E. 2009. 4D seismic monitoring of gas production and CO2 Sequestration, North West Australia. PESA News. February/March 2010 ed.: RESolutions Resource & Energy Services Pty Ltd.
  9. Lumley, D. E. 2010. 4D seismic monitoring of CO2 sequestration. The Leading Edge, 29, 150-155.
  10. Sasagawa, G. S., Crawford, W., Eiken, O., Nooner, S., Stenvold, T. & Zumberge, M. A. 2003. A new sea-floor gravimeter. Geophysics, 68, 544-553.
  11. Stenvold, T., Eiken, O. & Landro, M. 2008. Gravimetric monitoring of gas-reservoir water influx --- A combined flowand gravity-modeling approach. Geophysics, 73, WA123-WA131.
  12. Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P. & Sheriff, R. E. 1990. Applied Geophysics, Cambridge University Press.
  13. Zumberge, M., Alnes, H., Eiken, O., Sasagawa, G. & Stenvold, T. 2008. Precision of seafloor gravity and pressure measurements for reservoir monitoring. Geophysics, 73, WA133-WA141.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab251
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error