1887
ASEG2012 - 22nd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

A virtual source method (VSM) field experiment was performed at the Mirrabooka Trial Aquifer Storage and Recovery Site in Perth Basin, Western Australia. The experiment used hydrophones deployed simultaneously in two adjacent vertical fibreglass-reinforced plastic monitoring wells. The objective was to provide detailed P-wave velocities between two wells using conventional vertical seismic profiling equipment. It was hoped that the recovery of detailed velocity distribution would provide insight into the distribution of sand and clay above and within a highly heterogeneous injection interval. For the purpose of validating the processing methods used and to gain insight into the radiation pattern of the virtual source, the field experiment was duplicated with finite element numerical modelling. For both numerical and field experiments the seismic energy was propagated using 150 surface source positions with 2 m source point spacing. The seismic energy was recorded simultaneously at two vertical boreholes with 23 hydrophones. The hydrophones on each string were spaced at 10 m intervals. For the numerical model, nearsurface velocities were obtained from a refraction seismic survey. All other velocities were derived from acoustic wire-line logging and zero-offset VSP. The thickness of the unsaturated zone in the near-surface layer was approximately 5 m, with P-wave velocities ranging from 360 to 800 m/s. Beyond this was saturated sand/sandstone in which the P-wave velocity was close to 1600 m/s. We directly compare the velocity distributions derived from field and numerical modelling experiments and demonstrate that the virtual source method applied to dual vertical wells has considerable potential. Further analysis with numerical modelling indicates that detail in the crosswell velocity tomogram can potential be pushed to an even higher level of resolution by using dense receiver arrays.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab288
2012-12-01
2026-01-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bakulin, A., and Calvert, R., 2006, The virtual source method: theory and case study: Geophysics, 71, SI139-SI150
  2. Harris, B., Dupuis, C., Almalki, M., Li, Q.,Martin, M. and Prommer, H.2010. Near well seismic methods for aquifer recharge projects: Perth Basin Western Australia. The7th Annual International Symposium on Managed Aquifer Recharge, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
  3. Mehta, K., Snieder, R., Calvert, R., and Sheiman, J., 2008a, Acquisition geometry requirements for generating virtual source data: The Leading Edge.
  4. _____, K., Bakulin, A., and Kiyashchenko, D., 2008b, Comparing virtual versus real crosswell surveys: 78th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1372–1376.
  5. Minato, S., Onishi, K., Matsuoka, T., Okajima, Y., Tsuchiyama, J., Nobuoka, D., Azuma, H., and Iwamoto, T., 2007, Cross-well seismic survey without borehole source: 77th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1357–1361.
  6. Rockwater Pty Ltd., 2009, Mirrabooka aquifer storage and recovery trial: bore completion and hydrogeological evaluation, report no 236.20.4/09/01. Water Corporation.
  7. Snieder, R., Wapenaar, K., and Larner, K., 2006, Spurious multiples in seismic interferometry of primaries: Geophysics, 71,SI111–SI124.
  8. Wapenaar, K., Fokkema, J., and Snieder, R., 2005, Retrieving the Green’s function by cross-correlation: A comparison of approaches: Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 118, 2783–2786.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab288
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): tomography.; vertical seismic profiling; Virtual source
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error