1887
ASEG2012 - 22nd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

Magnetic field interpretation is often conducted on an incorrect assumption that remanent magnetization is insignificant and that the resultant magnetization direction is in the local geomagnetic field direction. For compact anomalies various methods exist to test this hypothesis and return estimates of magnetization direction utilising trial reduction to pole (RTP) transforms. We have developed an analysis to return the magnetization direction which generates the most symmetric RTE anomaly and have shown that this approximately also matches input magnetizations of synthetic compact anomalies. Estimation of magnetization direction from elongate anomalies is more problematic and intrinsically less reliable, but nevertheless we found that we were able to recover approximate magnetization direction from these anomalies using cross-correlation of an analytic signal function computed from vertically integrated gradients (which we term the ‘total vertically integrated gradient’ or TVIG) with RTP and RTE grids computed for trial magnetization directions. The various methods are readily and automatically obtained from scanning TMI grids. The resulting magnetization direction estimates are empirical rather than analytic and are approximate. They are best used as initial estimates prior to application of more rigorous, manual methods.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab333
2012-12-01
2026-01-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blakely, R,J., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  2. Cordani, R., and Shukowsky, W., 2009, Virtual Pole from Magnetic Anomaly (VPMA): A procedure to estimate the age of a rock from its magnetic anomaly only: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 69, 96-102.
  3. Dannemiller, N., and Li,Y., 2006, A new method for detection of magnetization direction: Geophysics, 71, L69-73.
  4. Fedi, M., Florio, G., and Rapolla,A., 1994, A method to estimate the total manetization direction from a distortion analysis of magnetic anomalies: Geophysical Prospecting, 42, 261-274.
  5. Foss, C.A., and McKenzie, K.B., 2011, Inversion of anomalies due to remanent magnetization: an example from the Black Hill Norite of South Australia: Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 58, 391-405.
  6. Li, X., 2006, Understanding 3D analytic signal amplitude: Geophysics, 71, L13-16.
  7. Phillips, J. D., 2005, Can we estimate magnetization directions from aeromagnetic data using Helbig’s integrals?: Earth Planets Space, 57, 681-689.
  8. Roest and Pilkington, M., 1993, Identifying remanent magnetization effects in magnetic data: Geophysics, 58, 653-659.
  9. Schmidt, P. W.and Clark, D. A., 1998, The calculation of magnetic components and moments from TMI: A case study from the Tuckers Igneous Complex, Queensland: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 609-614.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab333
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): remanent magnetization; RTE.; RTP
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error