1887
ASEG2012 - 22nd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Summary

There are a number of magnetic inversion methods that have been developed to map the structure and depth of sedimentary basins, assuming that sediments are nonmagnetic and underlain by magnetic basement. Gridding/mapping the basement depth estimates from such methods has two significant problems: 1) the magnetic results are dominated by signals coming from the top edges of basement faults such that the depth information from the down thrown sides of the faults is not captured and 2) within the centres of large basins there is often little variation in the magnetic anomaly to provide depth estimates such that when gridding the depth data, grid interpolation has to rely on a sparse distribution of estimated depths.

In this study we convert the magnetic data into pseudogravity which is then inverted to produce a 3D basin model with a constant susceptibility basement. This overcomes the interpolation problem since the 3D model now uses the complete pseudo-gravity field as well as the magnetic depth estimates to constrain the depth model. The method is applied to the Abu Gharadig basin, Western Desert, Egypt and generates results which match well controls on basement depth. The advantages of this method over 3D gravity inversion are that the pseudogravity response is not affected by structure within the sediments and is not compensated isostatically as the gravity response of basins often is affected.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab385
2012-12-01
2026-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Awad G. M., 1985, A geophysical study on the Abu Gharadig basin, Egypt: Geophysics 50, 5-15.
  2. Baranov, V., 1957, A New Method for Interpretation Aeromagnetic Maps: Pseudo-Gravimetric Anomalies. Geophysics, 22, 359-382.
  3. Blakely R. J., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Blakely, R. J., and R.W. Simpson, 1986, Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies (short note): Geophysics, 51, 1494-1498.
  5. Kimbell, G. S., Ritchie, J. D. Henderson, A. F., 2010, Threedimensional gravity and magnetic modelling of the Irish sector of the NE Atlantic margin: Tectonophysics, 486, 36-54.
  6. Parker, R., L., 1973, The Rapid Calculation of Potential Anomalies. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 31, 447-455.
  7. Pilkington, M., 2007, Locating geologic contacts with magnitude transforms of magnetic data. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 63, 80-89.
  8. Reeh G. And Aifa, T., 2008, Age of the source of the Jarrafa gravity and magnetic anomalies offshore Libya and its geodynamic implications. Journal of Geodynamics, 45, 217-233.
  9. Reid, A. B., Allsop, J.M. Granser, H., Millett, A.J and Somerton, I.W., 1990, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics, 55, 80-91.
  10. Saleh, K. H., 2004, Active faulting and seismic hazard assessment of the north western desert, with contribution of geographic information system; Annals. Geol. Surv. Egypt. V. xxviii 435-560.
  11. Salem, A., Williams, S., Fairhead, J. D., Ravat, D., and Smith, R., 2007 Tilt-depth method: A simple depth estimation method using first-order magnetic derivatives, The Leading Edge, 26, 1502-1505.
  12. Schlumberger, 1984, Well evaluation conference, Egypt, Galilec Imprimerie Moderene du Lion, Paris, France, 1-30.
  13. Thurston, J. B., and R. S., Smith, 1997, Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, susceptibility contrast using the SPI™ method: Geophysics, 62, 807-813
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2012ab385
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): basement; depth; inversion; magnetic; pseudo-gravity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error