1887
ASEG2013 - 23rd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

We present a multi-objective optimization approach to the subsurface geomodel updating problem using stochastic search techniques. This is a new approach to the geomodeling process for which a variety of direct and indirect measurements can simultaneously constrain the geomeodel. Due to the inherent uncertainties and noise in real data measurements, geological and geophysical datasets acquired in the same area may be in conflict with each other and a realistic subsurface model can only be obtained by simultaneously integrating the combined datasets in a reasonable manner. One approach to this problem is to perform joint inversion of multiple geological and/or geophysical datasets, where an optimal model is achieved by optimization of a linear combination of several objective functions measuring the match of the simulated datasets with the observed datasets. In this paper, we consider joint inversion of multiple datasets for geomodel updating, as a Multi- Objective Optimization Problem (MOOP), where separate objective functions for each subset of the observed data are defined. Then, a stochastic optimization technique is employed to find the set of best-compromise model solutions that fit the defined objectives along the Pareto front. We demonstrate that a customized initialization of the algorithm can speed up the convergence and result in a set of improved model solutions. We apply the proposed approach on a 3D reservoir litho-facies model that must honour a set of geological and geophysical attributes (e.g. log data and inverted seismic P- and S-wave impedances).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2013ab019
2013-12-01
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Coello, C. A., Van Veldhuizen D.A. Lamont G., 2002. Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  2. Deb. K., Pratap A. Agarwal S. and Meyarivan T., 2002. A fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6, No.2, 182-197.
  3. Emami Niri M., and Lumley D., 2013. Initializing dynamic reservoir models for history matching using preproduction 3D seismic data. 6th IPTC, Beijing-China, March 26-28, IPTC 16650.
  4. Grana D., Mukerji T. Dvorkin J. and Mavko G., 2012. Stochastic inversion of facies from seismic data based on sequential simulations and probability perturbation method. Geophysics, 77, No. 4, M53-M72.
  5. Kozlovskaya, E., Vecsey, L., Plomerova, J. and Raita, T., 2007. Joint inversion of multiple data types with the use of multiobjective optimization: problem formulation and application to the seismic anisotropy investigations, Geophysical Journal of International, 171, 761-779.
  6. Saussus D., Sams M., 2011. Facies as the key to using seismic inversion for modeling reservoir properties, First Break, 30, 45-52.
  7. Singh V.P., Dequet B. Leger M. Schoenauer M., 2008. Automatic wave-equation migration velocity inversion using multiobjective evolutionary algorithm, Geophysics, 73, No.5, VE61-VE73.
  8. Song L., 2011. NGPM-NSGA-II programming in Matlab.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2013ab019
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): multi-objective optimization; reservoir geomodel updating; seismic impedances
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error