1887
ASEG2013 - 23rd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

A method of joint inversion of Magnetotelluric, seismic refraction and seismic reflection (JIMRR) is developed especially for typical hydrocarbon or hard-rock mineral exploration. JIMRR includes two parts: jointed seismic refraction and seismic reflection; and its combination with Magnetotelluric (MT) method. The objective of the research is to enhance spatial resolution of the three model parameters: electrical resistivity, seismic velocity and reflector depth. Since horizontal coordinates of reflector are not treated as model parameters in existing travel time inversion algorithm, seismic forward modelling may loss the true reflection point locations at the side edges of reflector with limited extension. We developed the technology of extensible reflector to overcome this problem. JIMRR is completed by employing the cross-gradient function as constraints which enforces the structural similarity between the resistivity and the seismic velocities, so as to reduce velocity-depth ambiguity. The cross-gradient constraints are incorporated into the solution through least squares and Lagrange multiplier method. This method results in integrated symmetric square linear matrix that is solved by bi-conjugate gradient method (BiCG). Two example synthetic models show that our joint inversion can significantly enhance the spatial resolution of inversion; and also the velocity-depth ambiguity caused by reflection travel time inversion can be notably reduced by constraints from shallow lithologies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2013ab027
2013-12-01
2026-01-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Afnimar, A., Koketsu, K. and Nakagawa, K., 2002, Joint inversion of refraction and gravity data for the three- dimensional topography of a sedimentbasement interface: Geophysical Journal Internationa., 151, 243-254.
  2. Bube, K.P., Langan, R.T., and Resnick, J.R., 1995, Theoretical and numerical issues in the determination of reflector depths in seismic reflection tomography:: Journal of Geophysical Research, 100(B7), 12,449-12,458.
  3. Constable, S., Key, K., and Myer, D., 2007, OCCAM 3.0 release notes: http://marineemlab.ucsd.edu/Projects/Occam/ (accessed on Feb. 2012)
  4. Gallardo, L.A., and Meju, M.A., 2004, Joint two-dimensional DC resistivity and seismic travel time inversion with cross- gradients constraints: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109, B03311, doi:10.1029/2003JB002716.
  5. Gallardo, L.A. and Meju, M.A., 2007, Joint two-dimensional cross-gradient imaging of magnetotelluric and seismic traveltime data for structural and lithological classification: Geophysical Journal International, 169, 1261-1272.
  6. Huang, G.J., Bai, C.Y., Zhu, D.L., and Greenhalgh, S., 2012, 2D/3D Seismic Simultaneous Inversion for the Velocity and Interface Geometry Using Multiple Classes of Arrivals: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102(2), 790-801.
  7. Korenaga, J. 2011, Velocity-depth ambiguity and the seismic structure of large igneous provinces: a case study from the Ontong Java Platea: Geophysical Journal International, 185, 1022-1036.
  8. Korenaga, J., Holbrook, W.S., Kent, G.M., Kelemen, P.B., Detrick, R.S., Larsens, H.C., Hoppesr, J.R. and Dahl-Jensse, T., 2000, Crustal structure of the southeast Greenland margin from joint refraction and reflection seismic tomography: Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(B9),21,591-21,614.
  9. Lines, L. R., Schultz, A. K. and Treitel, S., 1988, Cooperative inversion of geophysical-data: Geophysics, 53, 8-20.
  10. Roecker, S., Thurber, C. and McPhee, D., 2004, Joint inversion of gravity and arrival time data from Parkfield: New constraints on structure and hypocenter locations near the SAFOD drill site, Geophysical Research Letters, 31(12), L12S04, doi:10.1029/2003GL019396.
  11. Said, K., and Kaila, K.L., 1996, Ambiguity in the solution to the velocity inversion problem and a solution by joint inversion of seismic refraction and wide-angle reflection times: Geophysical Journal International, 124, 125-227.
  12. Zelt, C.A., and Smith, R.B., 1992, Seismic traveltime inversion for 2-D crustal velocity structure: Geophysical Journal International, 108, 16-34.
  13. Zhang J., Brink, U.S.T., and Toksoz, M.N., 1998, Nonlinear refraction and reflection travel time tomography: Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(2), 29,743-29,757.
  14. Zhou, B., and Greenhalgh, S.A., 2005, Shortest path ray tracing for the most general 2D/3D anisotropic media: Journal of Geophysical Engineering, 2, 54-63.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2013ab027
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): inversion; magnetotellurics; refraction and reflection seismology.
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error