oa True-azimuth 3D Internal Multiple Attenuation without identifying the multiple generators

References

1. El-Emam, A., and Al-Deen, K.S., Zarkhidze, A. and Walz, A., 2011, Advances in interbed multiples prediction and attenuation: Case study from onshore Kuwait: 81st Meeting, SEG Abstracts, 3546-3550.
2. Griffiths, M., Hembd, J. and Prigent, H., 2011, Applications of interbed multiple attenuation: The Leading Edge, 30, 906-912.
3. Hung, B. and Wang, M., 2012, Internal demultiple methodology without identifying the multiple generators: 82nd Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts.
4. Jakubowicz, H., 1998, Wave equation prediction and removal of interbed multiple: 68th Meeting, SEG, Extended Abstracts, 1527-1530.
5. Lin, D., Young, J., Lin, W., Griffiths, M. and Hartmann, M., 2005, 3D SRME practice for better imaging: 67th Conference & Technical Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, A030.
6. Moore, I., and Bisley, R., 2005, 3D surface-related multiple prediction (SMP): A case history: The Leading Edge, 24, 270- 274.
7. Pica, A. and Delmas, L., 2008, Wave equation based internal multiple modeling in 3D: 78th Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2476-2480.
8. Reshef, M., Arad, S. and Landa, E., 2006, 3D prediction of surface-related and interbed multiples: Geophysics, 71(1), V1- V6.
9. Retailleau, M.G., Benjamin, N., Pica, A., Bendjaballah, M., Plasterie, P., Leroy, S., Delmas, L., Smith, R. and Shorter, J., 2011, Advanced 3D Land Internal Multiple Modeling and Subtraction, a WAZ Oman case study: 73 rd Conference & Technical Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts.
10. Verschuur, D.J. and Berkhout, A.J., 2005, Removal of internal multiples with the common-focus-point (CFP) approach: Part 2 - Application strategies and data examples: Geophysics, 70, V61-V72.
11. Weglein, A. B., Gasparotto, F. A., Carvalho, P. M. and Stolt, R. H., 1997, An inverse-scattering series method for attenuating multiples in seismic reflection data: Geophysics, 62, 1975-1989.