1887
ASEG2013 - 23rd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

The equivalent source is usually calculated by an iterative method, designed to converge on the observed potential field, magnetic or gravitational. Each iteration involves two Fourier transforms, one forward and one inverse. As the number of grid point increases the time penalty may become prohibitive. However, the number of transforms can be dramatically reduced by the transformation of the observed potential field to the frequency domain. We describe this method which reduces the number of Fourier transforms from to two, and demonstrate its use on a simple magnetic anomaly. An extension of this equivalent source technique is also given for the case of a draped magnetic survey that requires leveling correction. The observed data is separated into layers according to the height changes, and the equivalent source is iteratively calculated via comparisons of the upward continued data. Whilst this process is computationally intensive, it is designed to scale with the complexity, and hence the discretisation, of the topographical changes. This gives the method a speed advantage compared with similar Taylor series approaches. A synthetic example containing multiple dipole sources is used to test the method, and to illustrate the advantages and differences of draped surveys and the need to reduce the data to a common datum.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2013ab067
2013-12-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blakely, R. J., 1996, Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Cowan, D., and Cooper, G., 2003, Drape related problems in Aeromagnetic Surveys: The need for tight-drape surveys, ASEG abstracts 2003 (1), 1-4.
  3. Damney, C., 1969, The equivalent source technique: Geophysics 34, 39-53
  4. Emilia, D., 1973, Equivalent sources used as an analytic base for processing total magnetic field profiles: Geophysics 38, 339-48.
  5. Parker, R., 1973, The rapid calculation of potential anomalies: Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 31 (4), 447-455.
  6. Pilkington, M., 1998, Magnetisation mapping in rugged terain: Exploration Geophysics 29, 560-564.
  7. Pilkington, M., and Roest, W.,1992, Draping aeromagnetic data in areas of rugged topography: Jour. Appl. Geophys. 29, 135-142
  8. Woodward, D., 1993, Inversion of aeromagnetic data using digital terrain models: Geophysics 58, 645-652.
  9. Xia, J., Sprowl, D.R., and Adkins-Heljeson, D., 1993, Correction of topographic distortions in potential-field data: A fast and accurate approach: Geophyics 58 (4), 515-523
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2013ab067
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): draped survey; Equivalent layer; Fourier techniques; magnetic survey
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error