1887
ASEG2013 - 23rd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Geophysical data interpretation is largely an anomaly detection task which involves recognising and synthesising anomalous patterns within single or multiple datasets. The accuracy and efficiency of these interpretations heavily relies on the skills and practices of interpreters, thus the greatest challenge is to minimise personal biases to produce objective and consistent interpretation outcomes. We present an innovative data visualisation method which can empower interpreters to effectively delineate anomalies of varying frequency scales within aeromagentic data using a single image display. This is achieved by harnessing the power of image enhancement and visualisation techniques to assist interpretation.

We adapted and extended the use of colour composite techniques to present different frequencies presented in potential field data. Aeromagnetic data from an area in Kirkland Lake, Ontario, Canada is used for our experiment. long wavelength and short wavelength anomalies are identified from the data using low pass- and high pass filters respectively. These two different frequency enhanced images and the original image are represented as separate colour channels which are then combined to generate a composite image. The luminance of the composite image is scaled to highlight high frequency signals as they hold the key for detailed structure interpretation. We use a technique called dynamic range compression, which preserves the integrity of the phase component of the signal while performing high pass filtering. The resulting display is compared to the geological map of the area to validate the effectiveness of the method. The proposed technique is widely adaptable for different types of datasets.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2013ab147
2013-12-01
2026-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blakely, R.J., Simpson, R.W., 1986. Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic and gravity anomalies. Geophysics 51(7), 1494-1498.
  2. Cooper, G.R.J., Cowan, D.R., 2006, Enhancing potential field data using filters based on the local phase. Computers & Geosciences 32, 1585-1591.
  3. Cella, F., Fedi, M., Florio, G., 2009. Toward a full multiscale approach to interpret potential fields. Geophysical Prospecting 57, 543-557.
  4. Fedi, M., 2002. Multiscale derivative analysis: A new tool to enhance detection of gravity source boundaries at various scales. Geophysical Research Letters 29(2), 1029, 16.1-16.4.
  5. Frodeman, R., 1995. Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretive and historical science. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 107(8), pp.960 -968.
  6. Holden, E.J., Kovesi, P., Dentith, M.C., Wong, J., Fu, S.C., 2010, CET Grid Analysis Analysis Extension for Geosoft Oasis Montaj (http://www.geosoft.com/products/software-extensions/cet-grid- analysis)
  7. Ispolatov, V., Lafrance, B., Dubé, B., Creaser, R., Hamilton, M., 2008. Geologic and structural setting of gold mineralization in the Kirkland Lake-Larder Lake gold belt, Ontario. Econ. Geol. 103, 1309-1340.
  8. Kovesi, P., 2012, Phase Preserving Tone Mapping of Non- Photographic High Dynamic Range Images, Proceedings of DICTA (Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications).
  9. Milligan, P.R., Gunn, P.J., 1997 Enhancement and presentation of airborne geophysical data, AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, 17(2), pp.63-75.
  10. Rajagopalan, S. and Milligan, P., 1995, Image enhancement of aeromagnetic data using automatic gain control,” Exploration Geophysics, no. 25, pp.173-178.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2013ab147
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): aeromagnetic data enhancement; data fusion; data interpretation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error