1887
ASEG2013 - 23rd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Self-demagnetisation can significantly reduce the amplitude and modify the shape of the magnetic response from highly magnetic bodies. For quasi-planar bodies, only the transverse component of magnetisation is reduced, with the result that the direction of magnetisation rotates towards the plane of the body. Furthermore, when highly magnetic bodies are in close proximity, the assumption of uniform inducing field is violated. Rather, highly magnetic bodies can modify the local magnetic field appreciably, with the result that the magnetisation induced in one body is affected by the magnetisations induced in all the others. It is important to take such interactions between highly magnetic bodies into account.

Potential field modelling and inversion software “VPmg” has been upgraded to account for self demagnetisation and interaction between magnetic bodies. The algorithm computes H-field perturbations at the model cell centres in two stages: and . During initialisation, a demagnetisation tensor is estimated for each cell, from which a first estimate for the H-field perturbation is derived. During optimisation, the H-field field estimate is refined iteratively via an inversion procedure. Remanence can be taken into account.

The algorithm has been validated for homogeneous spheres, spheroids, slabs, and cylinders. It has also reproduced magnetic interactions between two horizontal cylinders for the case published by Hjelt (1973). Explicit verification for complex heterogeneous bodies requires a suitable independent algorithm for benchmarking.

The application to inversion in highly magnetic environments is illustrated on field data examples.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2013ab239
2013-12-01
2026-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Clark, D.A., Saul, S.J., and Emerson, D.W., 1986, Magnetic and gravity anomalies of a triaxial ellipsoid: Exploration Geophysics, 17, 189-200.
  2. Clark, D.A., French, D.H., Lackie, M.A., and Schmidt, P.W., 1992, Rock magnetism and magnetkc petrology applied to geological interpretation of magnetic surveys: CSIRO Exploration Geoscience Report 303 R.
  3. Clark, D.A., and Emerson, D.W., 1999, Self-demagnetisation: ASEG Preview, No. 79, 22-25.
  4. Fullagar, P.K., and Pears, G.A., 2007, Towards geologically realistic inversion: Proceedings of Exploration ’07, Fifth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration, Toronto.
  5. Fullagar, P.K., Pears, G.A., and McMonnies, B., 2008, Constrained inversion of geological surfaces - pushing the boundaries: The Leading Edge, 27, 98-105.
  6. Hjelt, S.E., 1973, Combined magnetostatic anomalies of two parallel circular cylinders: in Interpretation of Borehole Magnetic Data and Some Problems of Magnetometry, S.E. Hjelt and A.Ph. Phokin (eds.), Report No. 1, Department of Geophysics, University of Oulu, Finland, 1981.
  7. Newell, A.J., Williams, W., and Dunlop, D.J. , 1993, A generalization of the demagnetizing tensor for non-uniform magnetization: J. Geophysical Research - Solid Earth, 98, 9551-9555.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2013ab239
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): high susceptibility; interactions; inversion; Magnetic modelling; self-demagnetisation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error