1887
ASEG2013 - 23rd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Uncertainty in a migration based approach to surface and near surface microseismic monitoring occurs in two ways: uncertainty in the validity of detected events and uncertainty in the estimated position of the event. Synthetic modelling and comparison to case studies show that sign-to-noise-ratio is a key indicator of both types of the uncertainties. In this paper we present an analysis of both types of uncertainty using synthetic modelling to illustrate the performance characteristics of the migration process in terms of signal detection and false-alarm rates, along with uncertainties in positional estimates.

Examples from two case studies will illustrate that this kind of performance is achievable in actual monitoring surveys. Signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) is a key indicator of the uncertainty in migration based imaging of microseismic events. Reliability, in terms of the ability to detect the complete set of events is a nearly binary function of SNR. Events with SNR above a threshold of 2-3 are readily detected, while events with SNR below the threshold are missed. Positional uncertainties likewise are driven by SNR. While vertical uncertainty is more sensitive to noise, both horizontal and vertical uncertainties decrease rapidly with increasing SNR.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2013ab320
2013-12-01
2026-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bulant, P., L. Eisner, I. Psencik, and J. L. Calvez, 2007, Importance of borehole deviation surveys for monitoring of hydraulic fracturing treatments: Geophysical Prospecting, 55, no. 6, 891-899
  2. Chambers, K., S. Brandsberg-Dahl, J.-M. Kendall, and J. Rueda, 2008, Testing the ability of surface arrays to locate microseismicity: 78th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1436-1440
  3. Duncan P., Eisner L., 2010: Reservoir characterization using surface microseismic monitoring. Geophysics, 75, 75A139- 75A146
  4. Duncan, P. M., J. D. Lakings, and R. A. Flores, 2010, Method for passive seismic emission tomography: U. S. Patent 7,663,970 B2.
  5. Eisner, L., W., P. M. Duncan, M. Heigl, and W. R. Keller, 2009, Uncertainties in passive seismic monitoring: The Leading Edge, 28, 648-655
  6. Johnson, D., and Dudgeon, 1993, Array signal processing: Prentice Hall.
  7. Maxwell, S., 2010, Microseismic: Growth born from success: The Leading Edge, 29, 338-343
  8. Neyman, J., and E. Pearson, 1933, On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 231, no. 694- 706, 289-337
  9. Zhebel, O., D. Gajewski, and C. Venelle, 2010: 80th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 29, 2181-2185
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2013ab320
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): detectability; microseismic; migration; SNR; uncertainty
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error