1887
ASEG2013 - 23rd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Fully volumetric interpretation needs to encompass 3D delineation of geological features beyond the extraction of top and base horizons. To address this issue 3D geobody delineation techniques based on thresholding and voxel connectivity have been developed. Such techniques have limited applicability as there is often insufficient information to enable the discrimination of the constituent components of a geological system based on the seismic data alone.

Understanding how we perceive objects in images is central to the development of better interpretation tools. What we perceive in data is strongly influenced by geological knowledge, previous experience and analogues. These are subjective factors but to produce geologically realistic results we need to find a way of incorporating them within 3D geobody interpretation. A large step in this direction has been taken with a technology known as “adaptive geobody delineation”. The adaptive geobodies technique combines an adaptive, classification based region growing method, with interactive 3D surface manipulation techniques. This enables delineation of 3D geobodies that are a best fit to the data whilst matching the interpreter’s view of what is geologically realistic.

We present the potential utility of these techniques applied to the delineation of a variety of geological elements from seismic data acquired from the North Carnarvon Basin, North-Western Australia.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2013ab339
2013-12-01
2026-01-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Davies, R.J., Gras, R. and Payre, X., 2005, A Vision for 3D Seismic Technology and Visualization: Petroleum Geology Conference series, 6, 1483-1486, The Geological Society of London.
  2. Henderson, J., Purves, S.J. and Leppard, C. , 2007, Automated delineation of geological elements from 3D seismic data through analysis of multi-channel, volumetric spectral decomposition data. First Break, 25(3), 87-93.
  3. Henderson, J., Purves, S., Fisher, G. and Leppard, C., 2008, Delineation of geological elements from RGB color blending of seismic attribute volumes. The Leading Edge, 27(3), 342- 350.
  4. Henderson, J., Paton, G., Froner, B. and Lowell, J., 2012, Integrating interpretation expertise and objective data analysis in 3D: The Leading Edge, 31, 1374-1381.
  5. Judd, D.B. and Kelly, K.L., 1939, Method of designating colors: Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 23, 355-366.
  6. McArdle N.J., Kristensen, T., Lowell, J., Basford, H., Norton, D., Purves, S., 2010, Spits, channels and beaches: advanced imaging and delineation of Jurassic and Triassic stratigraphic targets. PETEX 2010 Extended abstracts.
  7. Von Helmholtz, H., 1866, Concerning the perceptions in general: In Treatise on physiological optics, vol. III, 3 rd edition. (Translated by Southall, J.P.C. 1925 Opt. Soc. Am. Section 26, reprinted New York: Dover, 1962).
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2013ab339
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Attributes; geobody; imaging; interpretation; visualisation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error