1887
ASEG2013 - 23rd Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Wave form excited by an acoustic dipole source in theory should consist of flexural waves only. Unfortunately usually it is contaminated by other acoustic modes including Stoneley, compressional wave and ringing casing. These undesired modes depend on the tool position inside the borehole, well deviation and its size, and presence of casing. Unwanted wave forms might be additionally augmented by poorly balanced dipole source and/or receivers. The classic semblance processing method will routinely deliver good looking results even when there are problems with one or more acoustic receivers and/or with poorly chosen processing parameters. Therefore I propose to add a complex wave form analysis as an additional quality control measure and to cross check the semblance method. Ways to identify a mixed acoustic mode condition and to eliminate biases in the shear slowness curves will be described. I also show how to qualify cross dipole data needed to perform shear wave anisotropy analysis.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2013ab364
2013-12-01
2026-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2013ab364
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): complex wave form analysis; dipole source; shear wave anisotropy
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error