1887
24th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition – Geophysics and Geology Together for Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Acoustic attenuation has been proved to be an indicator of stress changes in solid structures. Acoustic coda, as a superposition of incoherent scattered waves, reflects small-scale random heterogeneities in solids. Acoustic coda attenuation, as a combination of intrinsic attenuation and scattering attenuation, contains information on stress changes as a result of changes in the physical state of small-scale heterogeneous structures. Based on the ultrasonic measurements of a rock sample with intra-grain pores and fractures under different pore-pressure induced effective stresses, we compute the stress-associated coda attenuation quality factors and as a function of frequencies. Based on the digital heterogeneous cores of the sample, the experimental results are validated and corrected with numerical results by the finite-difference simulation of Biot’s poroelastic equations and the Monte Carlo simulation of multiple scatterings, respectively. The quality factors characterize its scale dependence of scattering attenuation on stress variations in rocks. We compare them with the intrinsic attenuation quality factors and calculated by the spectral ratio method and BISQ model, respectively, from ultrasonic measurements. Comparisons demonstrate that the scattering attenuation is much stronger, particularly when ultrasonic wavelengths are comparable to the scale of pores and grains. The intrinsic and coda attenuations versus increasing effective stresses present quite different nonlinear features, where and show a greater sensitivity to pore pressure than and Q.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab002
2015-12-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aki, K., 1969. Analysis of seismic coda of local earthquakes as scattered waves: Journal of Geophysical Research 74, 615631.
  2. Arntsen, B., Carcione, J.M., 2001. Numerical simulation of the Biot slow wave in water-saturated Nivelsteiner Sandstone: Geophysics 66, 890-896.
  3. Ciccotti, M., Mulargia, F., 2004. Differences between static and dynamic elastic moduli of a typical seismogenic rock: Geophysical Journal International 157, 474-477.
  4. Dvorkin, J.P., Nur, A.M., 1995. Elasticity of high-porosity sandstones: Theory for two north sea datasets: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.Document ID: 1995-0890. (1995 SEG Annual Meeting, October 8 - 13, Houston, Texas)
  5. Dvorkin, J., Mavko, G., Nur, A., 1991. The effect of cementation on the elastic properties of granular material: Mechanics of Materials 12, 207-217. Fehler, M., 1982. Interaction of seismic waves with a viscous liquid layer: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 72, 55-72.
  6. Gurevich, B., 1996. On “Wave propagation in heterogeneous, porous media: a velocity - stress, finite difference method” by Dai, N., Vafidis, A., Kanasewich, E.R.(March - April 1995 Geophysics, 327 - 340). Geophysics 61, 1230 - 1232.
  7. Guo, M.Q., Fu, L.Y., 2007. Stress associated coda attenuation from ultrasonic waveform measurements: Geophysical Research Letters 34, L09307.
  8. Guo, M.Q., Fu, L.Y., Ba, J., 2009. Comparison of stress-associated coda attenuation and intrinsic attenuation from ultrasonic measurements: Geophysical Journal International 178, 447-456.
  9. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., Dvorkin, J., 1998. The rock physics handbook: Tools for seismic analysis of porous media: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Sato, H., Fehler, M., 1998. Seismic Wave Propagation and Scattering in the Heterogeneous Earth: Springer-Verlag, New York.
  11. Stacey, G.P., Gladwin, M.T., 1981. Rock mass characterization by velocity and Q measurement with ultrasonics, in Anelasticity in the Earth: Geodynamics Series 4, 78-82, American Geophysical Union, Boulder, Co.
  12. Simmons, G., Brace, W.F., 1965. Comparison of static and dynamic measurements of compressibility of rocks: Geophysics 70, 649-656.
  13. Toksoz, M.N., Johnson, D.H., Timur, A., 1979. Attenuation of seismic waves in dry and saturated rocks, I: laboratory measurements: Geophysics 44, 681-690.
  14. Wei, W. Fu, L.Y., 2014. Monte Carlo simulation of stress-associated scattering attenuation from laboratory ultrasonic measurements. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 104, 931-943.
  15. Wu, R.S., 1982. Attenuation of short period seismic waves due to scattering: Geophysical Research Letters 9, 9-12.
  16. Wu, R.S., 1989. Seismic wave scattering, in The Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics: edited by James, D., pp. 11661187, Van Nostrand Reinhold, NewYork.
  17. Zhang, L.X., Fu, L.Y., Pei, Z.L., 2010. Finite difference modeling of Biot’sporoelastic equations with unsplit convolutional PML and rotated staggered grid: Chinese Journal of Geophysics (abstract in English) 53, 2470-2483.
  18. Zhang Y., Fu L.Y., Zhang L.X., Wei W., Guan, X.Z., 2014. Finite difference modeling of ultrasonic propagation (coda waves) in digital porous cores with un-split convolutional PML and rotated staggered grid: Journal of Applied Geophysics 104, 75-89.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab002
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error