1887
24th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition – Geophysics and Geology Together for Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Mineral deposits frequently have complex structures that can only be resolved by 3-D inversion of resistivity and I.P. data. A nonlinear optimisation routine is commonly used to create a 3-D model from the measured apparent resistivity and I.P. data. It is particularly important to be able to assess the reliability of the anomalies seen in the inversion model before further tests are conducted. In this paper, we examine the model resolution (MR) and volume of investigation (VOI) approaches in determining model reliability. The MR method produces sections that are easier to interpret but more computationally intensive that puts practical limitations for models with more than 50000 cells. The VOI method can be used for any data set where an inversion can be carried out, but produces sections with more complex patterns and prone to local artefacts. Either method should be used for any interpretation to discern anomalies that are likely to be supported by the data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab046
2015-12-01
2026-01-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Edwards L.S., 1977. A modified pseudosection for resistivity and induced-polarization: Geophysics, 42, 1020-1036.
  2. Kenma, A., Binley, A., Ramirez, A. and Daily, W., 2000, Complex resistivity tomography for environmental applications: Chemical Engineering Journal, 77, 11-18.
  3. Loke, M.H., Acworth, I., Dahlin, T., 2003, A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys: Exploration Geophysics, 34 , 182-187.
  4. Loke, M.H., Frankcoombe, K. and Rucker, D., 2013, The inversion of data from complex 3-D resistivity and I.P. surveys: ASEG-PESA 2013 23rd International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, 11-14 August 2013 - Melbourne, Expanded Abstracts, 79.
  5. Loke, M.H., Wilkinson, P. B., Chambers, P. B. and Strutt, M., 2014a, Optimized arrays for 2-D cross-borehole electrical tomography surveys: Geophysical Prospecting, 62, 172-189.
  6. Loke, M.H., Dahlin, T., Rucker, D.F., 2014b, Smoothness-constrained time-lapse inversion of data from 3-D resistivity surveys: Near Surface Geophysics, 12, 5-24.
  7. Oldenborger, G.A., Routh, P.S. and Knoll, M.D., 2007, Model reliability for 3D electrical resistivity tomography: Application of the volume of investigation index to a time-lapse monitoring experiment: Geophysics, 72, F167-F175.
  8. Oldenborger, G.A. and Routh, P.S. 2009, The point-spread function measure of resolution for the 3-D electrical resistivity experiment: Geophysical Journal International, 176, 405-414.
  9. Oldenburg, D.W. and Li., Y., 1999, Estimating depth of investigation in dc resistivity and IP surveys: Geophysics, 64, 403-416.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab046
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): model; reliability; resolution; VOI
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error