1887
24th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition – Geophysics and Geology Together for Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

ZTEM data acquired across the Humble magnetic anomaly of almost 30,000 nT were analyzed for the presence of a magnetic gradient response and the effects from elevated magnetic susceptibilities.

The response of moving the receiver coil through the magnetic-field gradient peaks at 0.01 Hz and drops off strongly with frequency. Lacking information about the field strength at the base station precludes the comparison of amplitudes between computed gradient responses and the survey data, but the comparison of response shapes suggests that the gradient responses are too small to have a noticeable effect on the survey data.

The 3D inversion of the magnetic survey data indicates magnetic susceptibility values as high as 2.0 (SI). Forward-modeling the ZTEM response for these -values combined with resistive half-spaces indicates that the response amplitudes and shapes strongly depend on the background resistivities. Ignoring the elevated -values during an inversion can result in the underestimation of conductivities and other artifacts, such as the mapping of patterns that resemble crop circles. For an environment such as Humble, with deep-seated zones of elevated -values, the shallow inverted conductivity structure appears to be reliable, but the deeper structure should be interpreted with caution.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab051
2015-12-01
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cao, J., Li, X., Sun, Y., He, Z., and Morgan, F.D., 2005, An approach for simultaneously inverting MT data for resistivity and susceptibility: 75nd International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 613-616.
  2. DeGroot-Hedlin, C., and Constable, S., 1990, Occam’s inversion to generate smooth two-dimensional models from magnetotelluric data: Geophysics,55, 1613-1624.
  3. Farquharson, C.G., Oldenburg, D.W, Haber, E., and Shekhtman, R., 2002, An algorithm for the three-dimensional inversion of magnetotelluric data: 72nd International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 649-652.
  4. Guo, W., Dentith, M.C., Bird, R.T., and Clark, D.A., 2001, Systematic error analysis of demagnetization and implications for magnetic interpretation: Geophysics,66, 562-570.
  5. Holtham, E., and Oldenburg, D.W., 2010, Three-dimensional inversion of ZTEM data: Geophysical Journal International,182, 168-182.
  6. Legault, J., Wilson, G.A., Gribenko, A.V., Zhdanov, M.S., Zhao, S., and Fisk, K., 2012, An overview of the ZTEM and AirMt airborne EM systems: a case study from the Nebo-Babel Ni-Cu-PGE deposit, West Musgrave, W.A.: Preview,158, 2632.
  7. Li, Y., and Oldenburg, D.W., 1996, 3-D inversion of magnetic data: Geophysics,61, 394-408.
  8. Sattel, D., and Witherly, K., 2012, An overview of ZTEM interpretation tools, In R.J.L. Lane (editor), Natural Fields EM Forum 2012: Abstracts from the ASEG Natural Fields EM Forum 2012: Published by Geoscience Australia, Geoscience Australia Record 2012/04.
  9. Wannamaker, P.E., Stodt, J.A., and Rijo, L., 1987, A stable finite-element solution for two-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling: Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society,88, 277-296.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab051
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error