1887
24th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition – Geophysics and Geology Together for Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

As a consequence of diminishing shallow mineral resources, the exploration industry has turned its focus to deeper targets. For this reason, the magnetotelluric (MT) method has gained much attention due to its unique penetration in regions of thick cover sequences. As the setting and geometries of mineral deposits are often complex, 3D models are required for their interpretation.

However, there has been little critical analysis of the ability of 3D MT surveys to recover structural geometry. A comparison of synthetic model responses demonstrate that while MT is greatly sensitive to conductive and symmetrical bodies at depth, its resolution for detecting finite 3D bodies is significantly reduced under conductive regolith cover. Although 2D inversions can recover the geometry of finite conductive bodies, it is possible to successfully interpret 2D survey data using 3D inversion algorithms. Utilising all components of the impedance tensor, off-profile 3D conductive structure can be obtained from 2D survey data alone.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab057
2015-12-01
2026-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Farquharson C.G., and Craven J.A., 2009, Three-dimensional inversion of magnetotelluric data for mineral exploration: an example from the mcarthur river uranium deposit, Saskatchewan, Canada: Journal of Applied Geophysics 68, 450-458.
  2. Han N., Nam M. J., Kim H. J., Song Y., and Suh J. H., 2009, A comparison of accuracy and computation time of three-dimensional magnetotelluric modelling algorithms: Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 6, 136.
  3. Mackie R.L., Smith J.T., and Madden, T.R., 1994, Three-dimensional electromagnetic modeling using finite difference equations: the magnetotelluric example: Radio Science 29, 923935.
  4. Newman G.A., and Alumbaugh D.L., 2000, Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using non-linear conjugate gradients: Geophysical Journal International 140, 410-424.
  5. Rodi W., and Mackie R.L., 2001, Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2-D magnetotelluric inversion: Geophysics 66, 174-187.
  6. Sasaki Y., 2004, Three-dimensional inversion of static-shifted magnetotelluric data: Earth, Planets and Space 56, 239-248.
  7. Siripunvaraporn W., Egbert G., Lenbury Y., and Uyeshima M., 2005a, Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion: data-space method: Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 150, 3-14.
  8. Siripunvaraporn W., Egbert G., and Uyeshima M., 2005b,
  9. Interpretation of two-dimensional magnetotelluric profile data
  10. with three-dimensional inversion: synthetic examples:
  11. Geophysical Journal International 160, 804-814.
  12. Tietze K., and Ritter O., 2013, Three dimensional magnetotelluric inversion in practice-the electrical conductivity structure of the San Andreas fault in central California: Geophysical Journal International 195, 130-147.
  13. Tuncer V.,Uunsworth M.J., Siripunvaraporn W., and Craven J.A., 2006, Exploration for unconformity-type uranium deposits with audiomagnetotelluric data: a case study from the Mcarthur River Mine, Saskatchewan, Canada: Geophysics 71, b201-b209.
  14. Varentsov I.M.. , Kulikov V.A., Yakovlev A.G., and Yakovlev D.V., 2013, Possibilities of magnetotelluric methods in geophysical exploration for ore minerals: Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 49, 309-3
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab057
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Magnetotellurics; mineral exploration; regolith; three-dimensional
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error