1887
24th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition – Geophysics and Geology Together for Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

This paper presents automatic 3D geophysical model generation based on equivalent pseudodepth slicing of the shape index of the equipotential surfaces derived from airborne gravity gradient data. The method is carried out in three steps. First, the pseudodepth slices of the vertical gravity gradient and the magnitude of the differential curvature components are generated. Second, the equivalent pseudodepth slices of the shape index are generated. Finally, 3D interpolation is carried out to obtain the final model.

The method is applied to FALCON airborne gravity gradiometer data from the Glyde Basin, Northern Territory and compared to an independently interpreted, integrated 3D geological Earth model.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab079
2015-12-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bhattacharyya, B. K., 1978, Computer modeling in gravity and magnetic interpretation: Geophysics, 43, 5, 912-929.
  2. Cevallos, C., P. Kovac, and S. J. Lowe, 2013, Application of curvatures to airborne gravity gradiometry data in oil exploration: Geophysics, 78, 4, G81-G88.
  3. Cooper, G. R. J., 2010, Enhancing Ridges in Potential Field Data: Exploration Geophysics 41, 170-173.
  4. Cooper, G. R. J., and D. R. Cowan, 2009, Terracing Potential Field Data: Geophysical Prospecting, 57, 1067-1071.
  5. Condi, F.J., 1999, Estimating subsurface structure through gravity and gravity gradiometry inversion: Ph.D thesis, Rice University.
  6. Dransfield, M. H., 1994, Airborne gravity gradiometry: Ph.D. thesis, University of Western Australia. Dransfield, M. H., and A. N. Christensen, 2013, Performance of airborne gravity gradiometers: The Leading Edge, 32, 8 908-922.
  7. Evjen, H. M., 1936, The place of the vertical gradient in gravitational interpretations: Geophysics 1, 127-136.
  8. Gerard, A., and N. Debeglia, 1975, Automatic three-dimensional modeling for the interpretation of gravity or magnetic anomalies: Geophysics, 40, 6, 1014-1034.
  9. Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., and H. Moritz, 2006, Physical geodesy 2nd ed.: Springer-Verlag Wien, 48-52.
  10. Koenderink, J. J., and A. J. van Doorn, 1992, Surface shape and curvature scales: Image and Vision Computing, 10, 557-564.
  11. Kovac, P., L. Titus, C. Cevallos and J. Bluett, 2014, Exploring for hydrocarbon plays in the Glyde Basin, Northern Territory using FALCON®AGG data: APPEA Conference Proceedings 54, Concurrent Session 21: New Horizons.
  12. Lee, M.D., W. A. Morris, G. Leblanc, and J. Harris, 2013, Curvature analysis to differentiate magnetic sources for geologic mapping: Geophysical Prospecting, 61, (S1), 572-585.
  13. Phillips, J. D., R. O. Hansen, and R. J. Blakely, 2007, The use of curvature in potential field interpretation: Exploration Geophysics, 38, 111-119.
  14. Roberts, A., 2001, Curvature attributes and their application to 3D interpreted horizons: First Break, 19, 85-100.
  15. Slotnick, M. M., 1932, Curvature of equipotential surface: AAPG Bulletin 16, 1250-1259.
  16. Spector, A., and F. S. Grant, 1970, Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data: Geophysics 35, 293.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab079
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Curvatures; Glyde Bas in; gradients; gravity; shape index
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error