1887
24th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition – Geophysics and Geology Together for Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Improved mining technology and scarcity of near-surface deposits is forcing the mining industry to explore deeper in the search for economic mineralisation. Reflection seismic is one of the few geophysical methods that have sufficient resolution at depth to constrain geological information of an ore deposit at the drilling scale. Reflection seismic methods can be used to reduce drilling costs by focusing the drilling in strategically important areas. Recently introduced seismic volumetric interpretation techniques have advantages over conventional interpretation techniques where the interpretation is done by slicing the volume in 2D planes. Volumetric interpretation is performed in 3D, in real time, by applying various opacity and transparency filters to the seismic volume from different angles, which enables in-depth understanding of the volume. This initial stage of volumetric interpretation is followed by mapping the interfaces and associated structures of exploration interest.

A 3D high-resolution seismic dataset was collected to investigate steeply dipping to sub-vertical structures in Kevitsa, northern Finland. Automatic fault extraction using a modified ant-tracking workflow was done on the seismic volume.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab097
2015-12-01
2026-01-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. De Pledge, J.E., 2000, Derivation of a 3-D Seismic Volume Interpretation Workflow for Fast Track Evaluation of a Large 3-D Seismic Data Volume: Gph1/00. Curtin University of Technology.
  2. Kidd, G.D., 1999, Fundamentals of 3d Seismic Volume Visualization. 1999 Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas.
  3. Koivisto, E., Malehmir, A., Heikkinen, P., Heinonen, S., and Kukkonen, I., 2012, 2d Reflection Seismic Investigations at the Kevitsa Ni-Cu-Pge Deposit,
  4. Northern Finland: GEOPHYSICS, 77, WC149-WC62.
  5. Malehmir, A. and Bellefleur, G., 2009, 3d Seismic Reflection Imaging of Vhms Deposits, Insights from ReProcessing of the Halfmile Lake Data, New Brunswick, Canada: Geophysics, 74, 209-19. doi:10.1190/1.3230495.
  6. Malehmir, A., Durrheim, R., Bellefleur, G., Urosevic, M., Juhlin, C., White, D.J., Milkereit, B., and Campbell, G., 2012a, Seismic Methods in Mineral Exploration and Mine Planning: A General Overview of Past and Present Case Histories and a Look into the Future: Geophysics, 77, WC173-WC90.
  7. Malehmir, A., Juhlin, C., Wijns, C., Urosevic, M., Valasti, P., and Koivisto, E., 2012b, 3d Reflection Seismic Imaging for Open-Pit Mine Planning and Deep Exploration in the Kevitsa Ni-Cu-Pge Deposit, Northern Finland: Geophysics, 77, WC95-WC108.
  8. Malehmir, A., Juhlin, C., Wijns, C., Urosevic, M., Valasti, P., Koivisto, E., Kukkonen, I., Heikkinen, P., and Paananen, M., 2011, 3d Reflection Seismic Investigation for Mine Planning and Exploration in the Kevitsa Ni-Cu-Pge Deposit, Northern Finland.
  9. Malehmir, A., Koivisto, E., Manzi, M., Cheraghi, S., Durrheim, R.J., Bellefleur, G., Wijns, C., Hein, K.A.A., and King, N., 2014, A Review of Reflection Seismic Investigations in Three Major Metallogenic Regions: The Kevitsa Ni-Cu-Pge District (Finland), Witwatersrand Goldfields (South Africa), and the Bathurst Mining Camp (Canada): Ore Geology Reviews, 56, 423.
  10. Malehmir, A., Tryggvason, A., Juhlin, C., Rodriguez-Tablante, J., and Weihed, P., 2006, Seismic Imaging and Potential Field Modeling to Delineate Structures Hosting Vhms Deposits in the Skellefte Ore District, Northern Sweden: Tectonophysics, 426, 319-34.
  11. Malehmir, A., Tryggvason, A., Lickorish, H., and Weihed, P., 2007, Regional Structural Profiles in the Western Part of the Palaeoproterozoic Skellefte Ore District, Northern Sweden: Precambrian Research, 159, 1-18.
  12. Milkereit, B., Eaton, D.W., Wu, J., Perron, G., Salisbury, M.H., Berrer, E., and Morrison, G., 1996, Seismic Imaging of Massive Sulphide Deposits: Part Ii. Reflection Seismic Profiling: Economic geology, 91, 829-34.
  13. Mutanen, T. and Huhma, H., 2001, U-Pb Geochronology of the Ko itelainen, Akanvaara and Keivitsa Layered Intrus ions and Related Rocks: Special Paper -Geological Survey of Finland, 33, 229-46.
  14. Reed, K., 1993, Seismic Reflection Surveying for Mining Exploration Applications, a Review of Practice Past and Current with an Outlook for the Future. Unpublished report, Mineral Industry Technology Council of Canada, 219.
  15. Roberts, D.M., 1998, Voxel Technology. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 167-68.
  16. Salisbury, M., Harvey, C.W., and Matthews, L., 2003, The Acoustic Properties of Ores and Host Rocks in Hardrock Terranes. Tulsa, Okla. (8801 South Yale St., Tulsa OK 74137-3175) : Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  17. Salisbury, M. and Snyder, D., 2007, Application of Seismic Methods to Mineral Exploration. in W.D. Goodfellow (ed.) Mineral Deposits of Canada: A Synthes is of Major Deposit-Types, District Metallogeny, the Evolution of Geological Provinces, and Exploration Methods, Geological Association of Canada, Mineral Deposits Division, Special
  18. Publication No. 5, 971-82.
  19. Schlumberger, 2013, Schlumberger Petrel 2013 User Manual. Copyright © 2013 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
  20. Taner, M.T., 2001, Seismic Attributes: CSEG Recorder, 26, 48-56.
  21. Urosevic, M., Kepic, A., Juhlin, C., and Stolz, E., 2008, Hard Rock Seismic Exploration of Ore Deposits in Australia: Post-Convention Workshop on High-Resolution Seismic Methods. 77th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 3613-14.
  22. Urosevic, M., Kepic, A., Stolz, E., and Juhlin, C., 2007. Seismic Exploration of Ore Deposits in Western
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab097
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error