1887
24th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition – Geophysics and Geology Together for Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Full 3D inversion of AEM data is not generally available to minerals explorers because of limitations in current algorithms and computer resources. Consequently we must resort to approximations to full 3D AEM inversion to support today’s exploration projects. One form of approximation is to reduce the dimensionality of the inverse problem from 3D to 1D and while layered earth inversion has proven fast and effective in practice, it has limitations in 3D environments. To address these limitations we propose a physically motivated approximate 3D AEM inversion: inversion. Full 3D EM inversion requires calculation of the 3D induced current in the earth whereas the Quasi3D approximation is based on a full 3D inversion but with a simplified, approximate, induced current flow in the earth. We demonstrate the Quasi3D approximation by comparing its response over the interface of a quarter-space model with the full AEM response, and then demonstrate Quasi3D inversion on a challenging synthetic model and on field data. From our work we conclude that the Quasi3D approximation is an effective and efficient approximation which should aid in the interpretation of AEM data for today’s exploration projects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab099
2015-12-01
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ellis, R. G., 2002, Electromagnetic inversion using the QMR-FFT fast integral equation method: SEG Technical Program Extended Abstracts, 2002: pp 21-25. doi: 10.1190/1.1817145
  2. Hohmann, G. W., 1988, Numerical Modelling in EM: Investigations into Geophysics No. 3, SEG, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
  3. Roos, P., Burgess, H., Ward, I., 2008, The Cerro de Maimon Project: NI 43-101 Technical Report, Micon Internation Limited, GlobeStar Mining Corporation, Perilya Ltd.
  4. Raiche, A., Sugeng, F., Annetts, D., 2003, Finding targets in complex hosts using airborne EM: ASEG Conference, Adelaide.
  5. Raiche, A., 2008, Final Report P223F Practical 3D EM Inversion for Exploration: AMIRA International and CSIRO Exploration and Mining.
  6. Smith, R. and Hodges, G., 2008, The HeliGeotem system, with an example of data from the Maimon Deposit in the Dominican Republic: AEM2008 - 5th International Conference on Airborne Electromagnetics Haikko Manor, Finland.
  7. Ward, S. H. and Hohmann, G. W., 1988, Electromagnetic Theory for Geophysical Applications: Investigations into Geophysics No. 3, SEG, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
  8. Zhdanov, M. S., 2002, Geophysical Inverse Theory and Regularization Problems, Method in Geochemistry and Geophysics 36, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab099
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): AEM; airborne EM inversion; Dighem; LEI; Quasi3D
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error