1887
24th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition – Geophysics and Geology Together for Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

A 3D seismic survey was designed, acquired and processed by HiSeis Pty. Ltd. in 2010 at the Kevitsa Ni-Cu-PGE deposit. The objectives of the survey were the definition of sub-vertical structures (knowledge of which could assist in the design and characterization of the slopes of the proposed open pit), and mapping out the general structural setting of the mafic intrusive.

The 2010 processing of the Kevitsa 3D seismic data was accelerated to meet engineering design deadlines. Although this phase of work was restricted to processing sequences that were not amplitude consistent and to the post stack migration algorithm, never-the-less the resultant product achieved good resolution of the complex structural setting.

The dataset was re-processed in 2014 with the goal of preserving relative signal amplitudes, in order that the volume could be inverted into an acoustic impedance cube. Another reason for re-processing was to improve imaging in shallow depth, by improving the static solution and velocity model used for imaging. Both of these processes are considered to be crucial steps in hard rock seismic data processing. Considerable improvement was achieved through the application of a pre-stack time migration (PSTM) algorithm. Conventional 3D deep-move out corrections (DMO), followed by a post-stack migration algorithm proved to be insufficient to handle the lateral changes of velocities. Consequently, pre-stack time imaging was attempted to aid in handling the highly complex velocity field. The goal was to derive a velocity model appropriate to the geologic environment in order to place events in their correct positions, to properly focus the energy, to avoid introduction of false structures and to flatten the image gathers.

The Kevitsa 3D seismic dataset is considered as being of high quality and as the data volume contains a statistically significant number of log measurements, it is deemed suitable for the seismic inversion.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab122
2015-12-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Emilia Koivisto, Alireza Malehmir, Pekka Heikkinen, Suvi Heinonen, and Ilmo Kukkonen, 2012, 2D reflection seismic investigations at the Kevitsa Ni-Cu-PGE deposit, northern Finland: Geophysics, 77, 149-162.
  2. Ferber, R. G., Sanders, B., and Yilmaz, O., 1996, Quick-look 3-D prestack time migration: 66th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Extended Abstracts, 451-545.
  3. Harrison, C. B., and Urosevic, M., 2012, Seismic processing, inversion, and AVO for gold exploration - Case study from Western Australia: Geophysics: 77, 235-243
  4. Hatherly, P., Urosevic, M., Lambourne, A., and Evans, B. J., 1994, A simple approach to calculating refraction statics calculations: Geophysics: 59, 156-160.
  5. Levy, S. and Fullagar, P. K., 1981, Reconstruction of a sparse spike train from a portion of its spectrum and application to high-resolution deconvolution: Geophysics, 46, no. 09, 12351243.
  6. Malehmir, A., C. Juhlin, C. Wijns, M. Urosevic, P. Valasti, and E. Koivisto, 2012, 3D reflection seismic imaging for open-pit mine planning and deep exploration in the Kevitsa Ni-Cu-PGE deposit, northern Finland: Geophysics, 77, 81-93.
  7. Oldenburg, D. W., T. Scheuer and S. Levy (1983), Recovery of the acoustic impedance from reflection seismograms, Geophysics, 48, 1318-1337.
  8. Williams, P. K., Urosevic, M., Kepic, A., Gibson, L., Donaldson, T., 2010, Design, acquisition and processing of a 3D seismic reflection survey over the Kevitsa Ni-PGE deposit, North Finland. The unpublished report of HiSeis Pty. Ltd.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab122
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error