1887
24th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition – Geophysics and Geology Together for Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Noise in seismic data can create significant challenges for the integration of 4D information into seismic history matching procedures. Impedances derived from a seismic inversion are usually compared to impedances provided by the coupling between a fluid flow and a petro-elastic model. The problem is that uncertainties associated with noise in seismic data are rarely carried though all the seismic inversion steps. And the noise in seismic data can alter the correlation between acoustic impedance and fluid saturation, resulting in erroneous estimates of reservoir properties.

We hypothesize that the amplitude domain could be a better option than the impedance domain for seismic history matching, considering seismic noise. To verify this hypothesis we analyse amplitude and impedance changes as a function of water saturation and seismic noise. We demonstrate that the noise in seismic data causes higher variations on seismic inversion results than on amplitudes. A cross-domain comparison suggests that these impedance variations can be as high as their values derived from the seismic baseline survey.

These results indicate that matching time-lapse seismic and fluid flow data in the amplitude domain may be more reliable than using the impedance domain - in the presence of strong seismic noise. Errors in seismic data, such as noise, need to be considered when undertaking seismic history matching, and proper uncertainty analysis is required for accurate reservoir predictions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab146
2015-12-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Johnston, D.H., 2013, Practical Applications of Time-lapse Seismic Data (2013 DISC): Tulsa, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  2. Kumar, D., and Landa, J.L., 2008, A reliable 4D seismic attribute for joint inversion of seismic and production data, in SEG Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S.A.
  3. Lancaster, S., and Whitcombe, D., 2000, Fast-track “ coloured “ inversion, in SEG 2000 Expanded Abstracts, p. 3-6.
  4. Landa, J.L., and Kumar, D., 2011, SPE 146771 Joint Inversion of 4D Seismic and Production Data, in SPE Annual and Technical Conference, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A.
  5. Landr0, M., Veire, H.H., Duffaut, K., and Najjar, N., 2003, Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation changes from marine multicomponent time-lapse seismic data: Geophysics, v. 68, p. 1592-1599.
  6. Maschio, C., Avansi, G., Schiozer, D., and Santos, A., 2013, Study Case for History Matching and Uncertainties Reduction based on UNISIM UNISIM-I:.
  7. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., and Dvorkin, J., 2011, The Rock Physics Handbook: CAMBRIDGE.
  8. Sagitov, I., and Stephen, K., 2012, Assisted Seismic History Matching in Different Domains: What Seismic Data Should We Compare?: Proceedings of SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference.
  9. Stephen, K.D., and Kazemi, A., 2014, Improved normalization of time-lapse seismic data using normalized root mean square repeatability data to improve automatic production and seismic history matching in the Nelson field: Geophysical Prospecting.
  10. Stephen, K.D., and Macbeth, C., 2006, Inverting for the petro-elastic model via seismic history matching SEG / New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting SEG / New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting: Simulation,, p. 1688-1692.
  11. Tura, A., and Lumley, D.E., 2000, Estimating Pressure and Saturation Changes From Time-Lapse AVO Data, in Ocean Technology Conference, Houston, Tx, p. 0-3.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab146
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): amplitude; fluid flow model; impedance; seismic history matching; time-lapse seismic
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error