1887
24th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition – Geophysics and Geology Together for Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Stratigraphic forward modelling (SFM) is an important subsurface modelling method. A numerical SFM program, such as the Sedsim software used in this study, is able to quantitatively model the sedimentation process with time in order to predict rock properties away from well data.

Although numerical SFM is a powerful technique, it is important to quantify and minimise the uncertainty in the resultant stratigraphic model. This uncertainty can be reduced by producing synthetic seismic traces from the results of the stratigraphic model. This simulated seismic may then be compared to observed seismic over the same area and the parameters of the stratigraphic model modified based on the results of the comparison.

In order to generate synthetic seismic from the results of a stratigraphic model, sediment properties from the stratigraphic model must be converted to acoustic properties. This becomes challenging at inter-well locations, or locations with little or no well control. Fortunately, such conversion can be achieved by the application of a suitable rock physics model even at those challenging locations.

The integration of a Sedsim stratigraphic model and the Velocity-Porosity-Clay (VPC) rock physics model in the Cornea field, Browse Basin, Australia shows the importance of integrating geological and geophysical methods in order to reduce uncertainty when predicting subsurface properties.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab151
2015-12-01
2026-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Siyabi, Q., Gurevich, B., and Madadi, M., 2012, Rock physics approach to synthetic seismic generation from sedimentary process modelling, private communication.
  2. CSIRO Petroleum., 2003, SEDSIM Stratigraphic Forward Modelling, <https://wiki.csiro.au/confluence/download/attachments/16089 1382/Sedsim_background.pdf>
  3. Geoscience Australia, 1997, Well Completion Report, Well Name: Cornea 1, 1B, 2.
  4. Goldberg, I., Gurevich, B., 1998, A semi-empirical velocity-porosity-clay model for petrophysical interpretation of P- and S-velocities, Geophysical Prospecting, 46, 271-285
  5. Griffiths, C. M., Dyt, C., Paraschivoiu, E., Liu, K., 2001. Sedsim in hydrocarbon exploration in Merriam, D., Davis, J. C. (eds) Geologic Modelling and Simulation. Kluwer Academic, New York, p.71-97
  6. Griffiths, C. M., and Hadler-Jacobsen, F., 1993, Practical Dynamic Modelling of Sequence Stratigraphy. In: Steel, R. et al (eds) Sequence Stratigraphy: Advances and Applications for Exploration and Production in North West Europe, Norwegian Petroleum Society.
  7. Griffiths, C.M., and Dyt, C., 2001, Six Years of SEDSIM Exploration Application (Abstract Only), AAPG Bulletin, 85(001), pg 13.
  8. Gurevich, B., Gerhardt, A., Lambert G., Griffiths, D.M., and Dyt, C. 2006, Numerical modelling of seismic character of depositional sequences, EAGE Internat. Geophys. Conf. Exhib., Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 16-19 October 2006, Expanded Abstracts, paper 1092.
  9. Lambert, G., Gurevich, B., and Brajanovski, M., 2006, Attenuation and dispersion of P-waves in porous rocks with planar fractures: Comparison of theory and numerical simulations, 71(3), N41-N45
  10. Moby Oil and Gas Ltd, 2009, Independent Geologist’s Report of WA-342-P (Cornea Field), WA-332-P/WA-333-P (Braveheart Prospect), WA-360-P (Artemis Prospect) And WA-409-P, Australia, 24-3
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab151
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): integration; physics; rock; Sedsim; synthetic
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error