1887
24th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition – Geophysics and Geology Together for Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

In these two case histories, drill hole surveying using down-hole electromagnetic surveys and wireline conductivity probes are used to determine the source of geophysical targets that remained unidentified after initial drill testing.

In the first example, after drilling the identification of the geophysical target remained uncertain, despite surface EM surveys determining it had a high conductance. Subsequent DHEM and conductivity surveys were clearly able to locate and define the targeted conductor.

In the second example, deep AMT targets could not be identified after drill testing. Using data from an AEM survey over the same area, and after subsequent DHEM surveying, it appears that the targets are probably artefacts of complex (frequency dependent) conductivity in the near surface soils and regolith.

Targeting errors are very costly. These examples emphasise how critical follow-up drill hole surveying can be to resolving unidentified geophysical targets and ensuring that exploration practices are sound and efficient.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab182
2015-12-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Gasperikova, E., Cuevas, N.H., and Morrison, F.H., 2007, Natural Field Induced polarisation for mapping of deep mineral deposits: A field example from Arizona: Geophysics, 70, 61-66.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab182
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): AEM; AMT; complex conductivity; conductivity logging; DHEM
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error