1887
24th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition – Geophysics and Geology Together for Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Interpretation methods and tools for geophysics datasets continue to evolve. Advances in clustering algorithms, the use of implicit functions to create 3D surfaces, new algorithms to estimate source depths and dips, and the availability of clever computational geometry libraries, contribute to the discipline of potential field interpretation techniques, allowing for a much more explicit statement of implied 3D description. While traditional scalar measures of potential fields have benefited from applying new ideas, perhaps more exciting is the reduction in ambiguity imposed from gradient measurement when used as the basis for field interpretation. Full tensor gravity gradiometry in particular, allows for 2D fault dip and throw calculations. Direct detection of high density bodies and faults via state-of-the-art gravity gradiometry is now a reality. Bodies greater than 200m in lateral extent are detectable. Implicit 3D structural geology modelling techniques derived from gravity curvature attributes of the observed gravity field present a leading edge technique for defining structurally controlled near surface geology geometry. A demonstration from the Bathurst camp dataset is given.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab201
2015-12-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Calcagno P, Chiles JP, Courrioux G, Guillen A, (2008) Geological modelling from field data and geological knowledge. Part I. Modelling method coupling 3D potential field interpolation and geological rules, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors.
  2. Chiles J P, Delfiner P (1999) Geostatistics: Modelling Spatial Uncertainty. 695 p (Wiley: New York)
  3. FitzGerald, D., 2006, Innovative Data Processing Methods for Gradient Airborne Geophysical Datasets: The Leading Edge (SEG), 25, No. 1.
  4. FitzGerald, D.,Milligan, P., 2013, Defining a deep fault network for Australia, using 3D “Worming”: :ASEG Extended Abstracts, Melb.
  5. FitzGerald, D., Chiles, J-P., Guillem, A. 2009, New Developments To Rapidly Delineate 3D Iron Ore Geology And Resource Models : Iron Ore 2009, AusIMM
  6. FitzGerald, D.,Corrieux, G. 2011, New methods for quantifying geology and geological engineering risk in large scale deep tunneling, both in design and in the build phase: Tunneling 2011, AusIMM
  7. FitzGerald, D.J., Holstein, H., 2014, Structural geology observations derived from full tensor gravity gradiometry over rift systems: SEG 2014 Denver Conference
  8. Goodfellow, W.D., McCutcheon, S.,R., Peter, J.,M.,2003, Massive Sulfide Deposits of the Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick, and Northern Maine: Introduction and Summary of Findings, Economic Geology Monograph 11, pp. 1-16
  9. Holstein, H., FitzGerald, D.J., Anastasiades, C., 2009, Gravimetric anomalies of uniform thin polygonal sheets: 11th SAGA Conference
  10. McCutcheon, S.R., Luff, W.M., and Boyle, R.W., 2003, The Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick, Canada: History of discovery and evolution of geologic models: ECONOMIC GEOLOGY MONOGRAPH 11
  11. McGrath, P. H., 1991, Dip and depth extent of density boundaries using horizontal derivatives of upward continued gravity data: Geophysics, v. 56, no. 10., 1533-1542.
  12. Tschirhart, P., 2013, Geophysical processing and interpretation with geologic controls: examples from the Bathurst Mining Camp. MSc thesis,McMaster University. Open Access Dissertations and Theses. Paper 7956.
  13. Ugalde, H. and Morris W.A., 2010, Deriving geological contact geometry from potential field data: Exploration Geophysics, 41(1).
  14. Van Staal C.R., Wilson R.A., Rogers N., Fyffe L.R., Gower S.J., lenghton J.P., McCutcheon S.R. and Walker J.A., 2002, Geology, Bathurst Mining Camp and Surrounding Areas, New Brunswick; Geological Survey of Canada Open File 4182, scale 1:100,000.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab201
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): foliation; implicit functions; source depth and geometry
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error